I know about the CP-violation experiments from the 60's and the P-violation from the 50's. But, is there a similar experiment which displays (perhaps historically in the same way as the experiements of Wu and Christensen) the violation of Charge conjugation alone?


There is not, because the combined transformation $CPT$ is a symmetry of all Lorentz-invariant systems. The $P$-violating decay distribution observed by Wu et al. is also a $C$-violating distribution, because polarized anti-cobalt would have had the opposite sign of asymmetry. (However no one has ever made, or probably will ever make, polarized anti-cobalt, so that particular claim is unverified.)

The Garwin, Lederman, and Weinrich experiment published simultaneously with Wu's result measured opposite polarizations for $\mu^+$ and $\mu^-$ produced from unpolarized pions. (Pions are spinless, and therefore unpolarizable.) The existence of the polarization is a $P$-violation; the correlation of polarization with charge is a $C$-violation; the pion-producing decays separately conserve $CP$ and $T$, to conserve $CPT$.

Conservation of $CP$ is an automatic consequence of a weak interaction with only two generations of isospin doublets; three generations are necessary for the CKM matrix to carry a $CP$-violating phase. We have experimental evidence that $CP$-violating phases in our universe are small, but the Sakharov conditions tell us that the evolution of the universe from baryon-symmetric to baryon-asymmetric requires a violation of $CP$ that distinguishes matter from antimatter. So the searches for small $CP$ violation are well-motivated.

The nontrivial phenomena that would fit your description would be processes that violate $C$ and $T$ but not $P$ (or, just as interesting, $P$ and $T$ but not $C$). Off the top of my head I cannot think of any such processes. The role of the $C$- and $P$-violating, mostly-$CP$-conserving weak interaction makes it unlikely that any such process exists.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.