1
$\begingroup$

There are two different and contradicting explanations given. Which one is correct?

Explanation 1: Cold air is more denser than hot air because ,when cold air of some density, say 'd' is heated, the molecules/atoms move apart from each other and so the volume expands. As mass of the air hasn't changes and the volume has increased, hot air is less denser than cold air.

Explanation 2: Hot air is more denser than cold air because ,air mostly comprises Oxygen(~20%) and Nitrogen(~78%). So this air, when starts holding water (i.e when it starts becoming cold), few O2(atomic mass 16 units) and N2(atomic mass 14 units) molecules are replaced by H20 (atomic mass 10 units). So, by Avogadro's law, for given volume of air at same temp and pressure and same number of molecules, cold air has lesser weight(H20 has lesser atomic mass) than hot air.

Which of the above two is correct? What causes sea breeze??

Is it that the second explanation is a special case of water acting as cooling agent, otherwise first case is true.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ They're not mutually exclusive. In the first case you're considering an isolated system of air, but in the second case you're assuming that the air is exposed to water that it can take on. $\endgroup$ – lemon Jun 14 '16 at 12:50
  • $\begingroup$ @lemon . Air above the sea is less denser, as it has more propablity of H20 replacing O2 and N2. If this is correct, less denser cold air must raise above thesea and hot air from land must replace the cold air above sea. So wind must blow from land to sea. But the opposite happens $\endgroup$ – user3219492 Jun 14 '16 at 12:54
  • $\begingroup$ Note that it is not correct to think of air 'holding' water: to a good approximation both air and water vapour are ideal gases with their own, independent, pressures, but sharing a temperature. $\endgroup$ – tfb Jun 14 '16 at 13:29
  • $\begingroup$ @tfb . Yeah, thank you for correcting me . But still my doubt remains the same. $\endgroup$ – user3219492 Jun 14 '16 at 13:34
  • $\begingroup$ @user3219492 Well, I think the answer is simple: humid air is denser than dry air, and both get less dense (other things being equal) if they are hotter $\endgroup$ – tfb Jun 14 '16 at 13:43
1
$\begingroup$

The equations for the density of air are available on the engineering toolbox site. The density of dry air is approximately given by:

$$ \rho_{dry} = \frac{0.0035\,P_0}{T} $$

where $P_0$ is the pressure and $T$ is the temperature. The density of moist air is approaximately given by:

$$ \rho_{wet} = \rho_{dry}\,\frac{1 + x}{1 + 1.609 x} $$

where $x$ is the mass fraction of water. Just for fun I calculated these in Excel assuming that $P_0 = 101325$ Pa and got:

Density of air

The first table shows the density in kg/m$^3$ while the second table is the same data but as a fraction of the density of dry air at $0$ºC.

The reason for the blanks in the table is that for any temperature there is a maximum amount of water that the air will hold. Again this is available from the engineering toolbox site. I have chosen the values of $x$ to be the maximum values at the temperatures 273K, 278K, and so on, so the bottom left portion of the table is empty.

I found the results rather surprising. The effect of humidity and temperature are almost equal in their effect - I had not expected humidity to have that big an effect.

This is all good fun, but it doesn't have any great bearing on the sea breeze. because the land is hotter than the sea the density of the air on the land is lower so it rises and pulls in air from the sea - hence the sea breeze. The moisture content of the air remains constant as the air flows, so all that changes is the temperature not the moisture content.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I race bikes on the velodrome and a few years ago I put an excel spreadsheet online to look at the effects on 200m, kilo, and 2k/3k/4k pursuit times as a function of air temperature, pressure and humidity. It's amazing how much hot, humid air can make times better. In some cases, a few percent change in humidity would have made the difference between getting a world record or not! $\endgroup$ – tpg2114 Jun 14 '16 at 14:59
  • $\begingroup$ Pilots all know dangers to watch for - high, hot, and humid - all make it harder to take off. $\endgroup$ – Mike Dunlavey Jun 15 '16 at 7:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.