I can understand that direct band gap semiconductor doesn't need phonon to absorb light. But in the following formula:

enter image description here The optical absorption coefficient is proportional to the square of $h\nu$ in the indirect band gap and to the square root of $hv$ in the direct band gap.

Doesn't it means that optical absorption coefficient gets a larger derivative in indirect band gap than in that of the direct band gap?

Why does the direct band gap semiconductor get higher optical absorption coefficient than an indirect band gap semiconductor?

enter image description here


The three-dimensional nature of a crystalline solid leads to a directional electron population. If a valence band maximum and conduction band minimum do not occur in the same electron-momentum direction, light absorption that would otherwise occur at the bandgap energy will be very unlikely. This is because the electron that hops up in energy (taking up the photon's energy to do so) must also change its momentum to complete that transition. Photons have enough energy, but do NOT contain enough momentum to make that quantum jump occur. So, the direct gap material has a higher photon absorption rate, because the 'easy' short-hop transition is not excluded by conservation of momentum.

There will be absorption due to more complex interactions, involving a third particle (usually a phonon being absorbed or generated), but those occur at a very low rate compared to the simpler direct electron promotion.

  • $\begingroup$ I think you're trying to say that for a given gap of energy $E$ to be considered "indirect", the momentum offset $p$ is larger than the momentum of a photon of energy $E$. In other words, $p \gg E/c$. $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Sep 15 '16 at 3:13
  • $\begingroup$ The Fermi surface is a representation in reciprocal space (kinda like a 3-D schmoo plot) of the momentum versus energy character in a crystal. The orientation of the bulges on this (symmetric) surface determines whether the bandgap is direct or indirect, irrespective of magnitude. $\endgroup$ – Whit3rd Sep 17 '16 at 5:15
  • $\begingroup$ Ok now ask yourself what happens if the bulges are offset in momentum by less than $E/c$ where $E$ is the energy gap. $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Sep 17 '16 at 13:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.