1
$\begingroup$

In my current research project in statistical mechanics, in the context of phase transition and condensation, I was reading the seminal paper of Yang and Lee titled: "Statistical theory of equations of state and phase transitions I. Theory of condensation” and there was a comment about a proved theorem which I could not understand, on page 2 right after theorem 1 they state the independence of the limit on the shape of the volume V, but then it is mentioned that this true so long as V is not so queer that its surface area increases faster than $ V^{\frac{2}{3}} $. The function mentioned in the theorem is the grand partition function. I do not understand this comment, so I am asking here in the hopes of having someone please help me. I have the section of the paper for reference. I thank all helpers.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Consider a cube with side length $a$. Then its perimeter is proportional to $a$, its surface area $A$ is proportional to $a^2$, and its volume $V$ is proportional to $a^3$.

It's clear that any reasonable 3D shape satisfies the same kind of scaling, which implies $A \propto V^{2/3}$.

However, it's possible for fractals to have perimeter/area/volume that do not scale with the usual power of $a$. For example, consider the Sierpenski triangle, shown below.

enter image description here

A Sierpenski triangle with side length $2a$ contains three Sierpenski triangles with side length $a$. Therefore, the area only triples when $a$ is doubled, so the surface area is proportional to $a^{\log_2 3}$. The quantity $\log_2 3$ is called the fractal or Hausdorff dimension. This breaks the usual scaling rule of area on perimeter (i.e. $a^2$).

The remark in your paper is just to rule out weird cases like this. You can, mathematically, do statistical mechanics with fractals, but I don't think it's very physically relevant, since physical systems have finite resolution.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As a simpler example that breaks the relationship, consider the following 2D system which only becomes longer in one direction: =, ==, ===, ==== et cetera. You see that the volume is increasing linearly, but so is the area! $\endgroup$ Jun 11, 2016 at 17:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RubenVerresen Good catch, I didn't think of that! I believe my answer is what the paper meant, mathematically, but yours is definitely more physically relevant. $\endgroup$
    – knzhou
    Jun 11, 2016 at 17:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.