1
$\begingroup$

I am reading Carroll's book. So looking at the Newtonian limit we write $g_{\mu\nu} = \eta_{\mu\nu} + h_{\mu\nu}$ where $h_{\mu\nu}$ is some small perturbation. He says that because $g^{\mu\nu}g_{\nu\sigma} = \delta^{\mu}_{\sigma}$ then, to first order in $h$, we have $g^{\mu\nu} = \eta^{\mu\nu} - h^{\mu\nu}$ where $h^{\mu\nu} = \eta^{\mu \rho} \eta^{\nu \sigma}h_{\rho \sigma}$. I don't see how this is the form of $g^{\mu \nu}$ to first order in $h$ though. Suppose $g$ does indeed have that form, then \begin{align*} g^{\mu \nu}g_{\nu \sigma} &= (\eta^{\mu \nu} - h^{\mu \nu})(\eta_{\nu \sigma} + h_{\nu \sigma}) \\ &= \eta^{\mu \nu} \eta_{\nu \sigma} + \eta^{\mu \nu} h_{\nu \sigma} - h^{\mu \nu} \eta_{\nu \sigma} - h^{\mu \nu}h_{\nu \sigma} \end{align*}

We want this be equal to $\eta^{\mu \nu} \eta_{\nu \sigma}$, meaning all those other terms have to be quadratic in $h$, but none of them appear to be?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ $\eta^{\mu\nu}h_{\nu\sigma}=h^\mu{}_{\sigma}, h^{\mu\nu}\eta_{\nu\sigma}=h^\mu{}_{\sigma}, h^{\mu\nu}h_{\nu\sigma}=O(h^2)\to 0$. $\endgroup$
    – Ryan Unger
    Commented Jun 6, 2016 at 3:42
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please elaborate. I don't see how those terms are quadratic in $h$. Perhaps I am confused about what is meant by this is a first order approximation. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 6, 2016 at 3:47
  • $\begingroup$ Only one of the terms is second order, the other two are equal but have opposite signs so they cancel. $\endgroup$
    – Ryan Unger
    Commented Jun 6, 2016 at 4:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Jesus Christ, I've got to get my eyes checked. I didn't notice that the first two terms are actually equal. Thanks $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 6, 2016 at 4:08

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Perhaps this is an easy way to see it. To first order in $h$, any tensor $T^{\mu \nu}$ can be written $T^{\mu \nu} = t^{\mu \nu} + \lambda h^{\mu \nu}$ for some $\lambda$ and tensor $\boldsymbol{t}$.

Now, for the metric tensor, we must have that $g^{\mu \nu} = \eta^{\mu \nu} + \lambda h^{\mu \nu}$ by matching with the $\mathcal{O}(0)$ term, i.e. $g^{\mu \nu} g_{\nu \sigma} = \delta^{\mu}_{\sigma} + \mathcal{O}(h)$.

Now it is just a simple expansion up to second order: $g^{\mu \nu} g_{\nu \sigma} = \delta^{\mu}_{\sigma} + \lambda h^{\mu}_{\sigma} + h^{\mu}_{\sigma} + \mathcal{O}(h^2)$, and $\lambda = -1$ follows.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.