Most accurate ways to find the average distance between stars in Milky way galaxy I've already posted here on quora. But, I'm not totally sure if it's the most reasonable method. 
Would anyone care to elaborate on how to find the average distance between stars in a given galaxy (For instance, let's take Milky way), somewhat efficiently and accurately - or at least clarify that my method is sufficiently efficient and accurate?
 A: As has been said, this is probably a very subjective question/answer.  Not only that, but the composition of galaxies, and even regions within a galaxy, varies a great deal.  Then there is the question of what constitutes as being part of the galaxy as opposed to perhaps a small orbiting dwarf galaxy.  The answer you got from the Quora seems to be pretty comprehensive.
The volume of an area of interest, divided by the number of stars in that area seems to be the one that most people take as the approach.  Which may not get a very accurate result, but smoothed out over said volume.  Although, I will note that the first technique given on the quora site gives an answer that is close to the accepted "average" in the Milky Way, so at least there doesn't seem to be a large disagreement there.  Of course, that assumes that the same initial starting conditions are used in both problems, which is highly unlikely since they aren't totally agreed upon anyway.
EDIT TO ADD:  For more examples of similar math, here Dr. Plait calculates the number of habitable planets (where he shows the calculation for the volume of the galaxy).  Making some assumptions of our own (like 200,000,000,000 stars which is LOW in my opinion), we come out to an average distance of about 5 light years.  Doubling the number of stars gives an average of about 4 light years though, so again, we are not off by factors.
