3
$\begingroup$

I've been trying to find how the energy-momentum tensor changes if we add a total derivative to the lagrangian: $$L\to L+\mathrm d_\mu X^\mu.\tag{1}$$

From the answer key: $$T^{\mu\nu}\to T^{\mu\nu}+\partial_\lambda F^{\lambda\mu\nu}\tag{2}$$ Where $$F^{\lambda\mu\nu}=\frac{\partial X^\lambda}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}\partial^\nu\phi -\frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial(\partial_\lambda\phi)}\partial^\nu\phi.\tag{3}$$ Is the above answer right? I'm not able to get this result! any help?

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by AccidentalFourierTransform, DilithiumMatrix, ACuriousMind, Asher, CuriousOne May 25 '16 at 21:56

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – AccidentalFourierTransform, DilithiumMatrix, ACuriousMind, Asher, CuriousOne
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\uparrow$ Which book? $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic May 25 '16 at 11:17
  • $\begingroup$ actually my friend gave me this result I'm not able to find it in any text book $\endgroup$ – jane May 25 '16 at 11:20
2
$\begingroup$
  1. Let us assume that the new and old Lagrangian density $${\cal L} \quad\to\quad {\cal L} +\sum_{\mu=0}^3 d_{\mu} {\cal X}^{\mu}\tag{A}$$ does not depend explicitly on the spacetime point $x$. Then Noether's 1st theorem states that the canonical stress-energy-momentum (SEM) tensor density $$ {\cal T}^{\mu}{}_{\nu} ~:=~ \frac{\partial{\cal L}}{\partial( \partial_{\mu}\phi)}\partial_{\nu}\phi- \delta^{\mu}_{\nu}{\cal L}\tag{B}$$ is conserved on-shell $$ d_{\mu}{\cal T}^{\mu}{}_{\nu}~\approx~0. \tag{C} $$ (In this answer we use calligraphic letters to denote densities.)

  2. Note that OP's formula (3) suggests that the vector density ${\cal X}^{\mu}(\phi(x),\partial\phi(x))$ depends on spacetime derivatives $\partial\phi(x)$ of the field $\phi(x)$. This would imply that the Lagrangian density (A) depends on higher spacetime derivatives $\partial^2\phi(x)$. This in turn goes against common physics lore, cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post and links therein.

  3. Let us for simplicity assume that the vector density ${\cal X}^{\mu}(\phi(x))$ does not depends on spacetime derivatives $\partial\phi(x)$. Then $$ d_{\nu} {\cal X}^{\mu}~=~\frac{\partial {\cal X}^{\mu}(\phi)}{\partial\phi}\partial_{\nu}\phi.\tag{D} $$ And hence the canonical SEM tensor density (B) changes as $$ {\cal T}^{\mu}{}_{\nu}\quad\to\quad {\cal T}^{\mu}{}_{\nu}+ d_{\nu} {\cal X}^{\mu} -\delta^{\mu}_{\nu} d_{\lambda} {\cal X}^{\lambda} ~=~{\cal T}^{\mu}{}_{\nu}+d_{\lambda} {\cal F}^{\lambda\mu}{}_{\nu}, \tag{E}$$ where the improvement term is $$ {\cal F}^{\lambda\mu}{}_{\nu}~=~ \delta^{\lambda}_{\nu}{\cal X}^{\mu}-\delta^{\mu}_{\nu}{\cal X}^{\lambda}~=~ - {\cal F}^{\mu\lambda}{}_{\nu} \tag{F}.$$

  4. In particular, the energy density $$ {\cal T}^0{}_0\quad\to\quad {\cal T}^0{}_0 - \sum_{i=1}^3 d_i {\cal X}^i \tag{G} $$ changes with a spatial 3-divergence, so that the energy $$ {\cal E} ~=~\pm \int_V \! d^3x ~ {\cal T}^0{}_0 \tag{H}$$ is unchanged under normal circumstances by the divergence theorem. Here we have used the Minkowski sign convention $(\pm,\mp,\mp,\mp)$.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.