1
$\begingroup$

In Griffiths pages 103-105 "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" 2nd editiion he states that the eigenfunctions of the position and momentum operators are $$g_y(x) = \delta(x-y)$$ where the eigenvalue equation is $$xg_y(x) = yg_y(x)$$

and for the momentum operator it is $$f_p(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \hbar}}e^{\frac{i p x}{\hbar}}$$ where the eigenvalue equation is $$\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{d}{dx}f_p(x) = p f_p(x).$$

In other literature, this is not stated, why is this the case? Are these in fact the eigenfunctions of the position and momentum operators?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Yes, they are the (not normalizable) eigenstates of the operators. And some things are not stated somewhere because not every book lists all true statements. $\endgroup$ Commented May 24, 2016 at 11:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LubošMotl Yeah but that seems like quite an important omission don't you think?...Especially for popular introductory literature like "Modern Quantum Mechanics" 2nd edition by N.Zettili. Griffiths also generally tries to avoid very advanced discussions. $\endgroup$
    – user100411
    Commented May 24, 2016 at 11:38
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe I agree (I don't know which book omits this thing so I can't feel "involved") - the plane wave is really an important wave function, the free particle is an important physics problem in QM - but there are lots of other operators with their eigenstates and eigenvalues, too. From some fundamental viewpoint, any operator is as good as any other. $\endgroup$ Commented May 24, 2016 at 11:44
  • $\begingroup$ "In other literature, this is not stated, why is this the case?" - How are we supposed to know what choices the textbook authors made of whatever book you're referring to here? $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Commented May 24, 2016 at 16:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There needs to be a canonical reference on how to treat $|x\rangle$ and $|p\rangle$ properly -- i.e., with rigged Hilbert spaces -- so that whenever books sweep the details under the rug, they can at least tell you where the rug is if you want to go look for them. $\endgroup$ Commented May 24, 2016 at 16:20

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

These relations are found in every book on QM, but the usual notation is $$ X|x\rangle=x|x\rangle $$ and $$ P|p\rangle=p|p\rangle $$

To go from these equations to the ones you've written, you just have to project them into the position basis $|x'\rangle$ (and use $\langle x'|x\rangle=\delta(x-x')$ and $\langle x'|p\rangle\sim\exp[ipx]$).

Edit Important: see ACuriousMind's comment below.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ It might be worth it to add a caveat about $\lvert x\rangle$ and $\lvert p \rangle$ not actually being states... $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Commented May 24, 2016 at 16:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.