2
$\begingroup$

I am reading Maxwell's "a treatise on electricity and magnetism, Volume 2, page 155" about "Ampere's Force Law". I have some confusion in the following pages:

enter image description here

enter image description here

On the top of the page, Maxwell says: (The coordinates of points on either current are functions of s or of s')

Does he mean we parametrize the path of one circuit with variable s and another circuit with variable s'?

Then he says: (If F is any function of the position of a point, then we shall use the subscript$_{(s,0)}$ to denote the excess of its value at P over that at A, thus $$F_{(s,0)}=F_{P}-F_{A}$$ Such functions necessarily disappear when the circuit is closed.)

Does he mean$$\oint F.ds = 0$$ or something else?

If he means something else by "Such functions necessarily disappear when the circuit is closed" what is it?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You must go back to page 511 and therein Figure 29. Image of this page has been added to your question. The variables $\:s\:$ and $\:s^{\prime}\:$ parametrize the two curves and more exactly are arc lengths from reference points $\:A\:$ and $\:A^{\prime}\:$ respectively. $\endgroup$ – Frobenius May 18 '16 at 9:11
  • $\begingroup$ On the other hand by "If F is any function ..." this function is not necessarily a vector function to use in a curvilinear integral $\:\int_{C} \mathbf{F}\cdot d \mathbf{s} \:$. The "disappearence" of $\:F_{(s,0)}=F_{P}-F_{A}\:$ in case of a closed curve is due simply to the coincidence of the final point $\: P\:$ with the initial point $\: A\;$. $\endgroup$ – Frobenius May 18 '16 at 10:29
  • $\begingroup$ OK thanks, I understand s and s' parametrize the two curves. $\endgroup$ – N.G.Tyson May 18 '16 at 10:30
  • $\begingroup$ I understand this. But in page 156, article 517, equation 19 there is a term 2Pr added inside the integral. I was considering it as a conservative vector field when dotted with ds' and integrated around closed path gives zero. Am I right or wrong? Please explain why that term 2Pr is added inside the integral in equation 19. $\endgroup$ – N.G.Tyson May 18 '16 at 11:00
  • $\begingroup$ On one hand, what is the relation of equation (19) with my comment about the function $\:F\:$ ??? On the other hand, must I read all the Chapter to explain what 2 is, what $\:P\:$ is, why $\:2Pr\:$ is inserted in an integral ?? You are reading the book by yourself. Continue trying to understand the ingenious Maxwell's thoughts and writings. $\endgroup$ – Frobenius May 18 '16 at 11:12
1
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

enter image description here

\begin{align} \int_{0}^{s^{\prime}}\dfrac{dP}{ds^{\prime}} \xi^{2}ds^{\prime} & = \biggl[P\xi^{2}\biggr]_{0}^{s^{\prime}} -\int_{0}^{s^{\prime}}P d\xi^{2}\\ & = \biggl[P\xi^{2}\biggr]_{0}^{s^{\prime}}-\int_{0}^{s^{\prime}}2P \xi d\xi\\ & = \biggl[P\xi^{2}\biggr]_{0}^{s^{\prime}}-\int_{0}^{s^{\prime}}2P \xi \underbrace{\dfrac{d\xi}{ds^{\prime}}}_{=l ^{\prime}}ds^{\prime}\\ & =\biggl[P\xi^{2}\biggr]_{0}^{s^{\prime}} -\int_{0}^{s^{\prime}}2P \xi l ^{\prime}ds^{\prime} \end{align}

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ While the OP may have found this helpful, to make a lasting, useful resource for future visitors this post does need additional clarification of what you're plotting and calculating, and why. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Jun 1 '16 at 13:47
  • $\begingroup$ What software are you plotting with? $\endgroup$ – WetSavannaAnimal Jun 1 '16 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Emilio Pisanty : This answer was a comment at the begining. I tried to help without answering. But later on I answered to an additional question on the same problem here : physics.stackexchange.com/questions/257127/…, a question already on hold. I don't think that these questions and answers are useful to the broader community, and to future users. The present question must be put on hold too. $\endgroup$ – Frobenius Jun 1 '16 at 17:55
  • $\begingroup$ @ WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance : GeoGebra free amazing software. It accepts text and equations in LateX as you see in the Figures. I saw this software last year as suggested tool in the right column of Physics SE. You will be surprised for its capabilities in a day by day use. $\endgroup$ – Frobenius Jun 1 '16 at 18:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Frobenius Fair enough. That's plotted with GeoGebra? I might need to give it a closer look, then. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Jun 1 '16 at 19:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.