1
$\begingroup$

I am currently reading the paper by Coleman on Symmetry breaking in 2d, which can be found here. On page 262 (4th page in the document), he is evaluating the following distribution:

$$ F_{\mu}(k)=\int d^2x\ e^{i k x} \langle0|j_\mu(x)\phi(0)|0\rangle.\tag{11b}$$

And finds since $k^\mu F_\mu = 0$, that it must be $$\sigma k_\mu\delta(k^2) \Theta(k^0) + \epsilon_{\mu\nu}k^\nu \rho(k^2) \Theta(k^0).\tag{13}$$

For some number $\sigma$ and function $\rho$.

I cannot see where-ever the $\Theta(k^0)$ part is coming from, can somebody point me the right direction?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is it correct to assume there is a fermi-surface at $k^0$? In that case the $\Theta$ functions will keep track of that surface. $\endgroup$ – Mikael Fremling May 16 '16 at 15:38
  • $\begingroup$ @MikaelFremling I don't think so, I'm not an expert but Fermi surfaces come from periodic lattices if I recall correctly, which is not the case here (its just an arbitrary QFT in 2d). $\endgroup$ – s.harp May 16 '16 at 16:14
  • $\begingroup$ Post about same paper: math.stackexchange.com/q/1787656/11127 $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic May 17 '16 at 12:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic yes that is my post^ $\endgroup$ – s.harp May 17 '16 at 12:40
1
$\begingroup$

Conventionally in QFT, particles and antiparticles are defined with positive energy $k^0\geq 0$ only. (Recall that would-be negative energy states are reinterpreted as matter/antimatter of the opposite kind in order to make the vacuum stable.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Would attempting to decompose $j_\mu$ and $\phi$ in a way similar to the Källen Lehman representation be the right way to show that the negative modes are zero? $\endgroup$ – s.harp May 16 '16 at 16:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.