1
$\begingroup$

What is the vacuum of classical Yang Mills theory $$\mathcal{L} = - \frac14 F^{a \mu \nu} F^a_{\mu \nu}~?$$ Is it simply $A^a_\mu=0$ for all its components?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

It depends on what you mean by vacuum.

If you mean a field configuration that has $F=0$, then the gauge potential is locally pure gauge (cf. this answer by Qmechanic), so there can only be global obstructions to the gauge equivalence class of the $A$ corresponding to $F=0$ being $A=0$ everywhere. On $\mathbb{R}^{1,3}$, there is no such obstruction.

If you mean a solution of the classical equations of motion in the absence of sources, but not necessarily $F=0$, then it gets a bit more interesting:

The Minkowskian $\mathbb{R}^{1,3}$ theory clearly, at least for the $\mathrm{U}(1)$ case, has non-trivial solutions - the electromagnetic waves.

The Euclidean theory in $4d,d\in\mathbb{N}$ dimensions has so-called instantons, which are (anti-)self-dual configurations of $F$, and thus local minima of the classical action. One example is given by the BPST instanton for $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ on $\mathbb{R}^4$, or the Harrington-Shepard caloron on $\mathbb{R}^3\times S^1$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ with vacuum I would mean the configuration that minimizes the potential of the lagrangian. Is that also $F=0$? Or is it not meaningful to divide YM fields into kinetic and potential terms? $\endgroup$
    – dan-ros
    May 10, 2016 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ @tonydo: Usually, one calls the entire $F\wedge{\star} F$ term (or $F^{a\mu\nu} F^a_{\mu\nu}$ in components) the "kinetic" term of a Yang-Mills field. $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    May 10, 2016 at 16:04
  • $\begingroup$ why is that? Even though the $A^4$ term doesn't come with any derivatives? $\endgroup$
    – dan-ros
    May 10, 2016 at 16:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @tonydo: The $A^4$ term doesn't have any meaning on its own as it is not gauge invariant. $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    May 10, 2016 at 16:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.