0
$\begingroup$

On page 90 of this set of lecture notes on quantum field theory, http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft/four.pdf a simple derivation is given to show that each component Dirac equation solves the klein Gordon equation. In the derivation this identity is used without explanation: $$ \gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}=1/2\{\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu} $$ The notes in their brevity seem to imply that its obvious or trivial but I cannot see it. The anti-commutation relations of the gamma matrices do not imply this (and indeed the anti-commutation identities are actually used later in the derivation). I thought you might be able to show this using the initial dirac equation expressed in co-variant form but I haven't made much progress there either.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

$\mu$ and $\nu$ are dummy indices.
So the value of the expression cannot possibly depend on them. Moreover, if you change $\mu\rightarrow\nu$ and $\nu\rightarrow\mu$, the value won't change.

This means: $$\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu\partial_\mu\partial_\nu=\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu\partial_\nu$$ (Since the partials commute)
Now sum them both and divide by two to obtain the result you wish to get.

(If you don't like $\mu\rightarrow\nu$ and $\nu\rightarrow\mu$, as some people find this confusing at first, you can first do $\nu\rightarrow a$ and $\mu\rightarrow b$ and continue from there)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.