1
$\begingroup$

For an ideal gas, the multiplicity of an ideal gas with $N$ molecules in Cartesian space is $$\Omega_{\text{space}}=\Big(\frac{V}{(\Delta x)^3}\Big)^N.$$ This is pretty intuitive, because we are simply dividing the total volume, i.e. $V^N$, by the total number of states (or spaces for states), i.e. ($\Delta x)^{3N}$. However, the multiplicity in the momentum space is $$\Omega_{\text{mom}}=\frac{V_{\text{mom}}}{(\Delta p)^{3N}}.$$

Why do we not take the entire expression to the power of $N$ for the momentum space?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I think this is actually a common misunderstanding of what is the definition of $V_\text{mom}$ for the case of $N$ particles. $V_\text{mom}$ is in fact the surface area of a $3N$-dimensional hypersphere with radius given by $\sqrt{2mE}=p$, where $E$ is the average energy per particle and $p$ is the modulus of the associated momentum in $3N$ dimensions. In other words, as you go from one particle to $N$ particles in the calculation of the multiplicity, the definition of $V_\text{mom}$ includes the $N$. We do not do the same for the real space volume because it is simply more natural to think in terms of the actual volume $V$ in $3D$ without changing its definition only because you now have more particles: the definition of the $V$ is independent of the number of particles $N$; this is not true for the volume $V_\text{mom}$.

Edition: Let me explain a bit more. In the case where $N=1$, we can say that the real volume multiplicity of one particle is $V/V_{particle}$. However, if we have $N$ particles, then we need to consider the number of possible states in real space volume of each particle and do the combinatorics. That's why we have the power $N$.

For the momentum space "volume" (which is actually the hypersurface area of a $3N$-dimensional sphere since most of the particles have energy not very far from $E$,and then most of the possible states in momentum are points of that surface determined by $E$), we have $V_\text{mom} \propto (\sqrt{2mE})^{3N-1}$ (because the area of a hypershpere in $D$ dimensions is proportional to the radius to the power $D-1$). Notice that $p^2=\sum_{i=1}^{N}(p_{ix}^2+p_{iy}^2+p_{iz}^2)$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you saying that it should be $V_{\text{mom}}^N$ and not $V^N$? $\endgroup$ – ODP May 7 '16 at 21:08
  • $\begingroup$ No, I am saying that the $N$ that you're looking for in $V_\text{mom}$ is actually already there, inside the definition of $V_\text{mom}$. $\endgroup$ – pscm May 7 '16 at 21:10
  • $\begingroup$ @ODP, please have a look at the new piece of answer I included. I am happy to explain more details if you need. $\endgroup$ – pscm May 7 '16 at 21:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.