0
$\begingroup$

The Heisenberg Representation of Quantum Computers (Daniel Gottesman) http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9807006

Suppose we have a quantum computer in the state $|\psi\rangle$, and we apply the operator $U$. Then

$U N |\psi\rangle = U N U^\dagger U|\psi\rangle$

so after the operation, the operator $U N U^\dagger$ acts on states in just the way the operator $N$ did before the operation. Therefore, applying $U$ to the computer transforms an arbitrary operation $N$ by

$N \rightarrow U N U^\dagger$

For the first step, I understand that placing $U^\dagger U$ on the right hand side has no effect; it resolves to the identity matrix.

I follow what the text is saying about considering the the right hand side as applying $U N U^\dagger$ after $U$ has been applied to the state.

I don't quite follow the result for how the observable $N$ is changed when the operator $U$ is applied: $N \rightarrow U N U^\dagger$. I'd appreciate it if someone who "gets" it could put a little more explanatory text between the two steps.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The author shows that since $UN$ equivalent to $UNU^\dagger U$, that it is possible to change the order of the operations, if $N$ is replaced by $M=UNU^\dagger $. In that case, $UN$ = $MU$.

The remaining logic follows from this.

Note that $ M $ is just $ N $ in the $ U $ basis; the choice of $ U $ uniquely determines how $ N $ changes to $ M $ for this special commutation relation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That makes sense to me, but I'm missing what the ability to change the order of the operations implies. $\endgroup$ – David B May 6 '16 at 1:07
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidB: I've included some analysis. Are there any U such that M=N? $\endgroup$ – Peter Diehr May 6 '16 at 2:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.