3
$\begingroup$

In natural units with $\hbar=1$ and $c=1$, as we know, the energy dimension of the Dirac field $\psi(x)$ in QED is $\frac{3}{2}$. But in cgs units, what is the true dimension of the Dirac field $\psi(x)$ in terms of cm, g and s? It seems that only the energy dimension of the Dirac field $\psi(x)$ is physical, is it true?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The Lagrangian for Dirac's equation is $$ \mathcal L=-mc^2\psi^2+\cdots \tag{1} $$

As we know that $H\sim\mathrm d^3\boldsymbol x\ \mathcal L$ has units of energy, we conclude that $$ \psi^2\sim x^{-3}\tag{2} $$ and therefore $\psi$ has units of $[\mathrm{length}]^{-3/2}$. If you use a different convention for $\mathcal L$ instead of $(1)$ you'll get a different result.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ So if we use different conventions as follows, \begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{L} & = & -mc^{2}\psi+\cdots\\ \mathcal{L} & = & -m\psi+\cdots\\ \mathcal{L} & = & -mc^{2}\hbar^{3}\psi+\cdots \end{eqnarray*} then $\psi$ may have different dimensions (up to some orders of $\hbar$ and $c$). These different dimensions of $\psi$ may not influence physical observables. Is this right? $\endgroup$ May 5, 2016 at 3:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RenhongFang yes, exactly :-) $\endgroup$ May 5, 2016 at 8:01
  • $\begingroup$ @RenhongFang anyway, if you think that my post was useful and fully answers to your question, it would be nice for you to click on the accept button (tick mark) so that the question gets the "answered" status. $\endgroup$ May 5, 2016 at 22:25
  • $\begingroup$ I am just a fresh, and thanks you for reminding me of this :-) $\endgroup$ May 6, 2016 at 1:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.