Are there non-trivial topological solutions (in particular 't Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopoles) associated with the (local) breaking

\begin{equation} SU(2)_R \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_{B-L} \to SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y \end{equation}



In order for a theory to present stable monopole solutions it has to satisfy three requirements:

i) It has to have the topological conditions, generally showed as non trivial second homotopy group of the vacuum manifold.

ii) It has to satisfy a quantization condition $$e^{ieQ_m}=\mathbb 1,$$ where $Q_m$ is the (non-Abelian) magnetic charge. This is a generalization of the Dirac quantization condition.

iii) The monopole has to be a solution of the classical equations of montion.

It can be shown that to satisfy ii) the $U(1)_{em}$ has to be compact (the electric charge has to quantized as well), that is, isomorphic to the circle and not to the reals. It turns out that when you have a SSB $G\rightarrow K\times U(1)$, the $U(1)$ is compact if $G$ and $K$ are both semisimple. Otherwise $U(1)$ may be non compact. In your case, $G$ is not semisimple, it has an Abelian factor.

For chiral symmetry breaking such as in QCD where the symmetry is global there are definitely no 't Hooft-Polyakov monopoles since those appear when you spontaneously break a local gauge symmetry. You are breaking a global one.

There are some studies about something called "semilocal defects" that may appear when you break a local and a global symmetry in a "mixed way".

What characterizes the stability of topological solutions as monopoles and vortices are topological quantities as the winding number. Take a vortex, for simplicity. Roughly speaking the winding number would say how the scalar field rotate as we go around the vortex. This rotation is in the internal space. With a global symmetry you are not able to construct such a rotating scalar field. The topological numbers would be trivial.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.