In Frontiers of Astronomy, Fred Hoyle advanced an idea from E.E.R.Holmberg that although the Earth's day was originally much shorter than it is now, and has lengthened owing to tidal friction, that further increases in the length of the day would not occur because of resonance effects in the atmosphere caused by the gravitational field of the sun.

I haven't heard that suggested anywhere else, though, and wondered whether it was really the case, or is the length of the day increasing?

  • $\begingroup$ the title does not really match the content. I was expecting a different discussion. $\endgroup$ – Stefano Borini Jun 5 '11 at 7:55

The length of a day is increasing slowly. The rate is very slow, about 0.0017 seconds per century.

The length of SI day is based upon the mean solar day between 1750 and 1892. A mean day nowadays (!) is about 0.002 seconds longer, which means that we accumulate a difference of about 0.6 seconds every year. This is why we have leap seconds (leap second is when we stop our clocks for one second to let the earth "catch up"). From the Wikipedia article on leap seconds:

The leap second adjustment (which is approximately 0.6 seconds per year) is necessary because of the difference between the length of the SI day (based on the mean solar day between 1750 and 1892) and the length of the current mean solar day (which is about 0.002 seconds longer). The difference between these two will increase with time, but only by 0.0017 seconds per century. In other words, the adjustment is required because we have decoupled the definition of the second from the current rotational period of the Earth. The actual rotational period varies due to unpredictable factors such as the motion of mass within Earth, and has to be observed rather than computed.

Also see: ΔT.

  • $\begingroup$ well, that does not address the question about the atmospheric influence, right? $\endgroup$ – Ilja Apr 23 '16 at 21:42
  • $\begingroup$ It seems the centuries are 1 minute longer as their predecessors. $\endgroup$ – user259412 Aug 28 '17 at 2:06

The Moon moves away about four centimeters a year on Earth, 15 while the Earth's rotation is slowing down, which will in the distant future total solar eclipses occur stop the moon not having sufficient size to cover the solar disk.

In theory, this separation should continue until the Moon takes 47 days to complete one orbit around our planet at which our planet would take 47 days to complete one rotation around its axis, similar to what happens in the Pluto-Charon system.

An associated effect is that the tides slow the Earth in its rotation (energy lost due to friction of the oceans with the sea), and since the Earth-Moon system has to conserve angular momentum, Moon makes up away now, 38 mm each year, as demonstrated by the laser distance measurements, made possible by the retro-reflectors that the astronauts left on the moon.

  • $\begingroup$ "An associated effect is" well, no, this is one effect; the reason for the rotation to slow down and for the moon to move away is tidal friction $\endgroup$ – Ilja Apr 23 '16 at 21:43

protected by Qmechanic Apr 23 '16 at 21:41

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.