1
$\begingroup$

Given the amplitude for a particular process, it may be possible to obtain the amplitude for another similar process by a so called crossing symmetry. I know there is a $s \leftrightarrow u$ crossing symmetry between the tree level diagrams appearing in Bhabha ($e^+ e^- \rightarrow e^+ e^-$) and Moller scattering ($e^- e^- \rightarrow e^- e^-)$ However, I am trying to understand how this is obtained. I put the relevant diagrams in the picture below.

enter image description here

What I have been trying to do is rotate the $s$ channel diagram appearing in Bhabha scattering (bottom right) to get a $t$ channel diagram with which I can relate to the $t$ channel diagram already appearing in the Moller scattering (top left). This would imply $p_1 \rightarrow p_1,\,\, p_2 \rightarrow -p_4, \,\,p_3 \rightarrow -p_2,\,\, p_4 \rightarrow p_3$ but this does not give the $s \leftrightarrow u$ sought after.

Thanks for any explanations!

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Crossing symmetry tells you that you should not only exchange $$p_2\leftrightarrow -p_4$$ in the amputated matrix elements, but also replace the wavefunction polarizations $$ u^{\pm}(p_2)\rightarrow v^{\mp}(p_4) $$ (where the spin polarizations have been reversed), and finally multiply the amplitude for a factor $-1$ (Since you are crossing a fermionic pair).

All of this is equivalent to the simple $s\leftrightarrow u$ only for the forward scattering at $t=0$ or for the scattering averaged over all the polarizations.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.