3
$\begingroup$

Given the Lagrangian $$L(q,\dot{q})=m\dot{q}^2/2-V(q)$$ and the corresponding action $$S[q]\equiv\int_0^t dt' (m\dot{q}^2/2-V(q)),$$ I need to be able to evaluate the second functional derivative $\frac{\delta^2S[q]}{\delta q(t) \delta q(t')}|_{q=q_{cl}}$. According to Altland/Simon's CMFT, \begin{equation*} \int_0^t dt \int dt' r(t) \frac{\delta^2 S[q]}{\delta q(t) \delta q(t')}|_{q=q_{cl}} r(t') = -\frac{1}{2} \int dt r(t) [m\partial_t^2 + V''(q_{cl}(t))]r(t). \end{equation*} My problem is that I can't figure out how to get the $\partial_t^2$ part when evaluating the function derivative. I would suspect that it's coming from taking the functional derivative of the kinetic energy part of the action. However, when using the definition $$\frac{\delta F[f]}{\delta f(x)} \equiv \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow0}\frac{1}{\epsilon}(F[f+\epsilon \delta_x]-F[f]),$$ I'm left with some really odd first- and second-derivatives of the Dirac delta function instead.

Could someone please show me how to evaluate these functional derivatives?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Integration by parts will solve all your troubles. $\endgroup$ Apr 22, 2016 at 9:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ More on higher functional derivatives: physics.stackexchange.com/q/123481/2451 $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Apr 22, 2016 at 10:44
  • $\begingroup$ Shouldn't $dtr(t)$ in the long equation be $dtdr(t)$? Where is the $\partial_t^2$ part? $\endgroup$ Sep 23, 2020 at 9:28
  • $\begingroup$ @MarkMitchison According to the answer below this isn't enough. $\endgroup$ Sep 23, 2020 at 9:34
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I already see the part I mentioned. $r$ is called $q$. That's a bit confusing. $\endgroup$ Sep 23, 2020 at 9:35

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

I know how to do this by simply expanding the action as a Taylor series in the deviation $r(t)$.

Expand the action \begin{align} \delta S =& S[q_{\mathrm{cl}} + r(t)] - S[q_{\mathrm{cl}}(t)] \\ =& \int_0^t\mathrm{d}t' \cdot\left\{ \frac{m}{2}\left[\partial_{t'}( q_{\mathrm{cl}} + r)\right]^2 - V(q_{\mathrm{cl}} + r) -\frac{m}{2}\left[\partial_{t'} q_{\mathrm{cl}} \right]^2 + V(q_{\mathrm{cl}}) \right\} \\ = & \int_0^t\mathrm{d}t' \cdot\left\{O(r) + \frac{m}{2} (\partial_{t'}r)^2 - \frac{1}{2}V''(q_{\mathrm{cl}})r^2 + O(r^{3}) + \cdots\right\} \end{align} where $O(r^n)$ means the $n$th order term. Then use integration by parts \begin{align} \int_0^t \mathrm{d}t'\cdot \left[\partial_{t'}r(t')\right] \left[\partial_{t'}r(t')\right] =& \left.r(t')\partial_{t'}r(t')\right|_0^t - \int_0^t \mathrm{d}t'\cdot r(t')\partial_{t'}^{2}r(t') \\ = & - \int_0^t \mathrm{d}t'\cdot r(t')\partial_{t'}^{2}r(t') \end{align} where we have used the fact that $r(0)=r(t)=0$ . So we get the second order term of $S$ \begin{align} \int_0^t \mathrm{d}t \int_0^t \mathrm{d}t'\cdot r(t) \frac{\delta^2 S[q]}{\delta q(t) \delta q(t')}|_{q=q_{cl}} r(t') = -\frac{1}{2} \int \mathrm{d}t \cdot r(t) [m\partial_t^2 + V''(q_{cl}(t))]r(t). \end{align}

Reference:

Appendix A of Density Functional Theory An Advanced Course by Eberhard Engel, Reiner M. Dreizler may be helpful to understand the relation between the Taylor expansion and functional derivative.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Hi there! Nice answer. Did you write it from memory? $\endgroup$ Sep 23, 2020 at 9:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Minor comment to the post (v1): Please consider to mention explicitly author, title, etc. of link, so it is possible to reconstruct link in case of link rot. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Sep 23, 2020 at 11:48
  • $\begingroup$ @DescheleSchilder I am reading Altland/Simon's CMFT now and also meet this problem. After read Appendix A of Density Functional Theory An Advanced Course, I did this derivative. $\endgroup$
    – ZQW
    Sep 23, 2020 at 12:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.