0
$\begingroup$

Consider pion states composed of $q \bar q$ pairs where $q \in \left\{u,d \right\}$ transforms under an $SU(2)$ isospin flavour symmetry. These bound states transform in the tensor product $R_1 \otimes R_2$ of two representations $(R_1, R_2)$ of $SU(2)$. Take $R_2$ as the fundamental representation of isospin with generators $I^i = \sigma^i/2$ and $R_1$ is the conjugate fundamental with generators $-(\sigma^{i})^*/2$. If the third component of isospin is $$I_{\pm}^{R_1 \otimes R_2} = \frac{1}{2} \left( \sigma_1^{R_1 \otimes R_2} \pm i \sigma_2^{R_1 \otimes R_2}\right)$$ I can try and form a representation of this operator using the standard Pauli matrices. Take $|\pi^+ \rangle = |u\rangle |\bar d \rangle \equiv |u \rangle \otimes | \bar d \rangle \equiv |u \bar d \rangle$

Then $$I_{+}^{R_1 \otimes R_2} |u \bar d \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \left( \sigma_1^{R_1 \otimes R_2} \pm i \sigma_2^{R_1 \otimes R_2}\right)|u \bar d \rangle = \frac{1}{2}\left( \sigma_1^{R_1} |\bar d\rangle \otimes \text{Id} |u \rangle + \text{Id} |\bar d \rangle \otimes \sigma_1^{R_2} |u \rangle \pm i(1 \leftrightarrow 2)\right)$$

1)My first question is if I take $|u \rangle \rightarrow (1,0), |\bar d \rangle = (0,1)$ then I have a tensor product of the form $(2 \times 1) \otimes (2 \times 1)$ Is such a tensor product even defined?

Alternatively, I could just construct the representations for $I_{\pm}^{R_1 \otimes R_2}$ and I would end up with $4 \times 4$ matrices. But what would the $4 \times 1$ objects that these operators act on represent? Would a generic vector be something like $(u, d, \bar u, \bar d)$ so for example I would write $u = (1,0,0,0)$ and $\bar d = (0,0,0,1)$ for example?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

It seems to me that there's a confusion about how the flavour is acting. In your example $R_1 \sim \bar{\bf{2}}$ and $R_2 \sim {\bf{2}}$. Therefore, by multiplying these representations we expect a singlet state ($\ell =0$) and a vector ($\ell =1$), i.e.,

$R_1 \otimes R_2 = \bf{1} \oplus \bf{3}$.

Now, if we identify the fundamental doublet as: $R_2 = \begin{pmatrix} u \\ d \end{pmatrix}\,, $ then $R_1 = \begin{pmatrix} \bar{d} \\ -\bar{u} \end{pmatrix}\,, $ and:

$R_1\otimes R_2 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{u}{u}+\bar{d}{d}) \oplus \begin{pmatrix} \bar{d}u \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{d}{d}-\bar{u}{u})\\ -\bar{u}d \end{pmatrix} $

The $\pi^{\pm}$ state you are looking for is in the vector of course since it is electrically charged.

Edit:

Here I give the derivation based on the isospin matrices. We can define the matrix $$I_{++} =I_+\otimes I_+\,.$$ This matrix can act on the tensor product $R=R_1 \otimes R_2$ as $$ I_{++} R =I_+ R_1 \otimes I_+ R_2=\begin{pmatrix} \bar{d} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\otimes \begin{pmatrix} u\\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \equiv |\bar{d}>|u> \equiv |\pi^+> $$

Applying $I_{--}$ and $I_{0^+}\equiv\frac{1}{\sqrt 2} (I_{+-}+I_{-+})$ will give you exactly the vector I derived above. You can get the singlet as $I_{0^-}=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2} (I_{-+}-I_{+-})$

You can represent the $I_\pm$ matrix in a reducible $4 \times 4$ form, of course, and $R$ as $4\times 1$ as $$ I_{++}= \begin{pmatrix} I_+ & 0 \\ 0& I_+ \end{pmatrix}\,, R=\begin{pmatrix} R_1 \\ R_2 \end{pmatrix} $$

You see that you get a natural notation with the definition of $R_1$ I used ; $I_{\pm\pm}$ gives $\pi^{\pm}$ and $I_{0^\pm}$ gives you the $\pi^0$. If you want to use instead $R_1=\begin{pmatrix} \bar{u} \\ \bar{d} \end{pmatrix}$, you should change the definitions of the $I$s accordingly, e.g. $I_{++} \to I_{+-}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi xi45! Thanks for your response! I am just wondering why you chose $$R_1 = \begin{pmatrix} -\bar{d} \\ \bar{u} \end{pmatrix}$$- why not for example, $$R_1 = \begin{pmatrix} \bar{u} \\ \bar{d} \end{pmatrix}?$$ $\endgroup$ – CAF May 7 '16 at 13:33
  • $\begingroup$ Hi! Because in $SU(2)$, $\mathbf{\bar 2} \sim \epsilon {\mathbf{2}}$. Where $\epsilon$ is the anti-symmetric $2\times 2$ tensor. $\endgroup$ – xi45 May 7 '16 at 14:05
  • $\begingroup$ There are two equivalent ways of doing the singlet contraction. This causes some confusion. In principle, you write $R_1=\epsilon \begin{pmatrix} \bar u \\ \bar d \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} -\bar d \\ \bar u \end{pmatrix}$, and you do the $SU(2)$ product: $R_1 \otimes R_2$. Or you can define $R_1 =\begin{pmatrix} \bar u \\ \bar d \end{pmatrix}$, but then you do the dot product $R_1.R_2$. Both lead to the same result because the $SU(2)$ has an $\epsilon$; for two generic doublets $v_{1,2}$, we have: $v_1 \otimes v_2 = v_1.(\epsilon.v_2)$. $\endgroup$ – xi45 May 7 '16 at 14:12
  • $\begingroup$ Ok thanks! Could you explain why $$\bf \bar 2 \propto \epsilon \bf 2?$$ $\endgroup$ – CAF May 7 '16 at 14:38
  • $\begingroup$ I used $\sim$ to say : 'transforms as'. It's not a $\propto$ sign. It's a feature of the $\mathbf{2}$ of $SU(2)$; pseudoreality, check out e.g., scipp.ucsc.edu/~dine/ph222/group_theory_primer.pdf $\endgroup$ – xi45 May 7 '16 at 14:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.