When we say that a lattice has a particular symmetry we mean that the lattice is mapped onto itself by the symmetry. So if I have a (2d) material which has inversion symmetry in the bulk and which has an atom at a point $(x,y)$ then inversion symmetry tells me that there is another, identical atom at $(-x, -y)$.
At the surface, however, this is no longer true. In your diagram there is a atom at $(\frac{1}{2}a, -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}a)$ but there is nothing at $(-\frac{1}{2}a, \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}a)$, so the system is not inversion symmetric.
What you are thinking of when you say that if I invert a crystal about a point on its surface we get back another valid structure, only with the positions of atom mirrored about the surface. That is is I have some model for the interactions between the atoms with some Hamiltonian $\mathcal{H}$ then if your original crystal was a solution for this model then there is another corresponding inverted solution. In that case we would say the the Hamiltonian has a symmetry but that this symmetry is broken in our particular solution.