0
$\begingroup$

I found this equation that describes the change in angular momentum $\vec{L}$ of a rigid body rotating about a fixed point $O$. $I_o$ is the moment of inertia of the body with respect to the axis of rotation and I marked with $⊥$ the component of the angular momentum perpendicular to the axis of rotation.

$$\vec{L_o} = I_o \vec{ω} + \vec{L_o}_⊥ \implies \frac{d\vec{L_o}}{dt}= I_o \frac{d\vec{ω}}{dt}+ \frac{1}{ω} \frac{dω}{dt} \vec{L_o}_⊥ + \vec{ω} \times \vec{L_o}_⊥ = \vec{\tau}_{ext}$$

In the derivation the following was used $ \vec{L_o}_⊥ = \vec{\omega}A \hat{L_o}_⊥ $ with $A$ some constant depending on the distribution of mass.

How does the middle term $\frac{1}{ω} \frac{dω}{dt} \vec{L_o}_⊥$ come out and what does it means?

It is a part of the derivative of $\vec{L_o}_⊥$ but I don't understand how and why it is there.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Found this equation where? $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Apr 16 '16 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ My edit suggestion was rejected, but the arrow on $ω$ in $\vec{L_o}_⊥ = \vec{\omega}A \hat{L_o}_⊥ $ is wrong and incoherent, the direction is already given by $\hat{L_o}_⊥ $ so the RHS has two juxtaposed vectors. $\endgroup$ – L. Levrel Apr 21 '16 at 9:31
2
$\begingroup$

As you mentioned, $\vec {L_o}_⊥$ is proportional to $\omega$. So the middle term means $\vec {L_o}_⊥$ varies by varying angular velocity.
You can also derive this. formula like this:
$$\frac{d \vec {L_o}_⊥ }{dt}= \frac {d\vec{\omega}}{dt}A \hat{L_o}_⊥+ \vec{\omega}A \frac{d\hat{L_o}_⊥}{dt}= \frac{1}{\omega} \frac{d \omega }{dt} \vec{L_o}_⊥ + \vec{ \omega } \times \vec{L_o}_⊥ $$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.