0
$\begingroup$

My question concerns the plane wave solutions to the Majorana equation. First, recall the Dirac equation:

$$(i\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu-m)\psi=0$$ I suggest a solution in the form of a plane wave with $\vec{p}=0$ and $c=\hbar=1$: $$\psi=\psi_0 e^{\pm imt}$$ Plugging this into the Dirac equation, I find the equation

$$\gamma^0 \psi_0=\pm \psi_0$$

This leads to four real-valued terms for $\psi_0$, which correspond to the two spin solutions for positive and negative energies. I tried doing the same exact thing for the Majorana equation, but now I have

$$\widetilde{\gamma}^0\psi_0=\pm \psi_0$$

where $\widetilde{\gamma}^0$ is given in the Majorana basis as

$$\widetilde{\gamma}^0=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & -i\\ 0 & 0 & -i & 0 \\ 0 & i & 0 & 0\\ i & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$$ When I solve the above for $\psi_0$, I then get a complex solution, which doesn't make sense. I thought that, under the Majorana basis, solutions would be of the form $\psi=\psi^*$? Also, a plane wave solution should still work for the Majorana equation, because, like its Dirac counterpart, it is still a factorization of the Klein-Gordon equation. Any explanation of what I'm doing wrong would be greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A Majorana fermion is one in which $\psi^* = B \psi$ for some matrix $B$. $\psi$ itself does not have to be real (and typically is not). $\endgroup$ – Prahar Apr 15 '16 at 23:09
  • $\begingroup$ @Prahar but wouldn't the fact that the $\gamma$ matrix is purely imaginary ensure a real $\psi$? Also, I would have thought that the positive and negative energy solutions would have been the same in the Majorana basis--however, one can see from the above that is not what one gets when one solves for $\psi_0$. $\endgroup$ – Joshuah Heath Apr 16 '16 at 0:02
  • $\begingroup$ Can you explain that comment more? Why should a purely imaginary $\gamma$ imply a real $\psi$? $\endgroup$ – Prahar Apr 16 '16 at 17:47
  • $\begingroup$ @Prahar If $\gamma$ is imaginary, then I thought that the equation $(i\gamma\partial_\mu-m)\psi=0$ would yield a real solution $\psi$. $\endgroup$ – Joshuah Heath Apr 16 '16 at 17:55
0
$\begingroup$

In the Majorana representation, the Dirac equation is real and therefore the real and imaginary part of the solution separate. So far, so good. By plugging in the plane wave a complex exponential, the solution stay of course complex. Try $sin(mt)$ and $cos(mt)$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.