I am trying to work out the mathematics behind the design of an old mechanical brake tester. The device sits in the passenger foot well of a vehicle and tests the brake efficiency. The device is basically a pendulum with a stylus attached, and as the brakes are applied the pendulum swings and draws up a card. The card is marked in acceleration, or deceleration in this case, (as a % of local gravity) in increments of 10 up to 100% (9.81 m/s2).

Brake Tester Diagram

I am trying to verify the mathematics behind how the instrument functions, by applying an angle to the device, essentially simulating an acceleration. When testing the equipment I can raise the stylus ever so slightly off the paper to remove the effects of friction, so applying an angle will result in a true acceleration reading.

I equated this to; Acceleration = g sin (34) Then I would need to rearrange this to calculate which angles I need to be applying to test each nominal acceleration reading (10,20 and so on).

Is friction a large enough factor that the card will be accounting for this? The distance between the scale divisions on the card get smaller and smaller as it progresses towards 100%. Should I be correcting for the initial friction coefficient. I have the measurements for the length of the pendulum 0.140m and the weight on the end of the pendulum 10 oz.

I found a similar thread of discussion but the results I am obtaining in my tests are slightly out from my calculations. However this error could be in the device itself.

Finding the acceleration at an angle

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ for what are you asking exactly? a relation between angle and acceleration? or the error created by friction? or you've made an experiment whose results deviated from calculations... $\endgroup$ – Tofi Apr 14 '16 at 12:17
  • $\begingroup$ Where is the center of mass of the pendulum and where is it pivot. It is hard to tell from the diagram. $\endgroup$ – John Alexiou Apr 14 '16 at 13:47
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for replying. I am trying to relate angle to horizontal acceleration. $\endgroup$ – WelshJohn Jun 1 '16 at 18:42

If the pivot is accelerating horizontally (together with the body) at a rate of $a_{pivot}$ then the angular acceleration of the pendulum is

$$ \ddot{\theta} = - \frac{m c (a_{pivot} \cos\theta + g \sin \theta)}{I_{zz} + m c^2} $$

where $c$ is the distance from the pivot to the center of mass, $m$ the total swinging mass and $I_{zz}$ the mass moment of inertia about the center of mass.

The equilibrium position is at

$$ \theta = - {\rm atan}\left(\frac{a_{pivot}}{g}\right) $$

The acceleration of the pendulum as a function of distance $\ell$ from the pivot is $$ a = a_{pivot} \left(1- \frac{m c \ell}{I_{zz} + m c^2} \right) $$

So if the stylus is located at the center of percussion $\ell = c + \frac{I_{zz}}{m c}$ the stylus point will not move in an inertial frame as $a = 0$ at $\theta=0$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your help. However, I am still struggling to solve this. Maybe if I try a slightly different approach? If a linear acceleration equal to that of gravity was exerted on the pendulum in my example, how many degrees would the pendulum travel through? (linear acceleration = 9.81 gravity=9.81 mass=0.063kg length of pendulum = 0.140m centre of mass 0.1075m). $\endgroup$ – WelshJohn May 23 '16 at 22:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.