25
$\begingroup$

In my textbook it is given that

'The wave function describes the position and state of the electron and its square gives the probability density of electrons.'

Can someone give me a very simple example of a wave function with explanation? (Note: This question is not a duplicate. I have searched for other questions of this type but the answers were overwhelmingly difficult to understand.)

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ While I'm aggreeing that this post isn't a duplicate, your argument for it isn't valid since "I don't understand the existing answers" isn't expressing anything about what is differen't to them. $\endgroup$ – Zaibis Apr 13 '16 at 10:46
  • $\begingroup$ $\psi(x):= \langle x | \psi \rangle$ $\endgroup$ – Rodriguez May 21 '16 at 19:20
20
$\begingroup$

A wave function is a complex-valued function $f$ defined on ${\mathbb R}^1$ (if your electron is confined to a line) or on ${\mathbb R}^2$ (if your electron is confined to a plane) or ${\mathbb R}^3$ (if your electron ranges over three-space), and satisfying $$\int |f|^2=1$$ (where the integral is defined over the entire line or plane or 3-space).

Every electron has an associated wave function, and any function satisfying the above can be the wave function associated to some electron.

The wave function tells you everything there is to know about the electron. For example, if $A$ is any set, and if you perform an experiment that answers the question "is the electron in the set $A$?", then the probability you'll get a "yes" answer is given by $$\int_A |f|^2$$

(So in particular, if $A$ is the entire space, you're asking "Is the electron anywhere at all?", and the probability of a yes answer is $1$.)

The next steps are to learn:

1) How do I use this wave function to predict the outcomes of questions about something other than the electron's location, such as, for example, its momentum?

and

2) How does this wave function change over time?

I don't think you're quite yet at the point of addressing those questions (though you will be soon enough).

$\endgroup$
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ Although a nice explanation, I though "simple language" meant that a layman can understand it, with just very basic mathematical knowledge. $\endgroup$ – vsz Apr 13 '16 at 8:01
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ "Every electron has an associated wave function" sounds wrong to me. It suggests that in a system with two electrons each individual electron would have its own wave function, which is wrong since they instead have a joint wave function. $\endgroup$ – Oscar Cunningham Apr 13 '16 at 8:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @G.Bach Good question. Yes, this is one of the ways that quantum is different from classical. The most marginal information we can give about an electron is called its density matrix, but a density matrix is different from a wave function. $\endgroup$ – Oscar Cunningham Apr 13 '16 at 11:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @G.Bach This is to do with entanglement. Two electrons can be connected in more ways than just having a classical correlation between them. $\endgroup$ – Oscar Cunningham Apr 13 '16 at 11:09
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @G.Bach: For a system with multiple electrons and multiple possible observations, the joint probability distributions for various pairs of observations are not the marginals of any joint probability distribution for all of the observations. This is (in essence) Bell's Theorem and it's exactly why quantum observables cannot be treated as classical random variables. $\endgroup$ – WillO Apr 13 '16 at 12:43
7
$\begingroup$

The wave function is the solution to the Schrödinger equation, given your experimental situation. With a classical system and Newton's equation, you would obtain a trajectory, showing the path something would follow: the equations of motion. For a quantum mechanical system you get a wave function, and the rules it obeys over time. With this you can determine the odds for your particle to be someplace, which is as close as you can get to a trajectory.

You normally learn most of the math first, then Newtonian mechanics, and then quantum mechanics. Hopefully by then you will be able to put it in context.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

A "wave function" is a mathematical model (or representation) of a given wave. A "function" is represented by the symbol $f$. It can be a function of distance (x), time (t), space (r), etc. and is usually represented by an equation. If the equation represents a wave, then the function is a wave function.

For example, a simple wave with constant amplitude and varying in time can be described by: $A \sin{t} $. Its wave function would be $f_{(t)} = A \sin{t}$. You can evaluate it over some interval, by integrating over the interval.
In the case of the electron, its wave function has already been described in WillO's answer.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ From the question is obvious that it refers to the wave function in quantum mechanics. In some texts the concept may refer to any function that satisfies the wave equation and it seems that this is the meaning you think about. But the previous answers and comments have made it clear that this is not relevant here. $\endgroup$ – nasu Jun 9 '17 at 13:38
1
$\begingroup$

I am taking seriously your request for a simple language answer, & would also be happy to provide a more complex answer. My answer hopefully provides, by a progressive series of simple statements and examples, a way of actually conceiving what a wave function is. You may want to scroll to the final paragraph.

A function is a mathematical representation of something. A wave function is a mathematical representation of a wave.

Consider y = sin x This might describe the momentary snapshot of a wave made by wiggling a rope.

This shape would move along the x-axis with time, so y= Sin(x-t) would be a very simple example of a sine wave moving along a rope.

I'm sure I will be dissed for answering your question literally. I do have 4 years of tertiary maths and 3 years of tertiary physics behind me, but you did seem to want a very simple example.

An electron is sometimes represented as somewhat like a short burst of waves, and the complex formula for this "shape" is called the wave function. Your quote from the textbook is not a definition of a wave function, it is telling you something about the wave function representing an electron.

You can imagine a straight line with a burst of wave activity somewhere along its length. If the line represents distance, then the position of the burst is the location of the electron. If the line represents time then it indicates when the electron was at some location. The wave function of an electron describes the time, location, and in fact everything we could know about the electron.

Because any method of looking at the electron has an effect on it (rather like using a torch to find out what rabbits do in the dark), we never really know exactly every value of every parameter associated with the electron.

The wave equation therefore can not simply tell us where the electron is, or how fast it is going. It gives us the probabilities of the electron (or other phenomenon) being at any location at any speed.

In our everyday experience, the way we imagine particles to be is quite adequate. It is easy to forget that this conception of a particle is a model, not a reality. In fact there is no such thing as a distinct surface of a particle. When we are dealing with things at a sub-atomic level, our everyday concept breaks down, and we admit that we only know probabilities of the where-and-when of a particle.

The wave function for an electron therefore includes everything we know about the electron, which includes that it is not a particle in the everyday sense, but is an array of greater and lesser probabilities of being somewhere at some time. The complexity is not a reflection of reality, but rather of how difficult it is to create a model than can be understood by a mind that generally needs to relate to what can be perceived by the senses.

$\endgroup$
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ The question refers to a quantum mechanical wave function. This is not really an answer. $\endgroup$ – Jaywalker Apr 13 '16 at 8:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The question specifically requests a very simple example of a wave function. This is not really a criticism. $\endgroup$ – John Malcolm Apr 13 '16 at 9:15
  • $\begingroup$ @Jaywalker this is not the sort of thing we delete for not being an answer here. One might believe that it's not a useful answer, but that's different. $\endgroup$ – David Z Apr 13 '16 at 9:51
  • $\begingroup$ I'm terrified by your "moving sin wave" [sic]. At any rate, a sine function may be used to model a wave, but that doesn't make it a wave function. A wave function is something very specific, and you have chosen to ignore that and intentionally misinterpret the question. -1 for you. $\endgroup$ – MPW Apr 13 '16 at 17:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\Psi=\sin{x}$ is not a valid wave function, because $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\Psi |^2 dx \neq 1$, and the Schrodinger equation isn't satisfied. $\endgroup$ – TheBro21 Jan 3 '17 at 18:29
0
$\begingroup$

First of all any physical particle is in some "state" that contains all the observable information. Classically the state of a particle is govern by position $x$ and momentum $p$, that is, every observable quantity is a function of $x$ and $p$, e.g. kinetic energy, potential energy, angular momentum etc.

In quantum mechanics definite position and momentum no longer exist but are spread out in the space. The information of both position and momentum are contained in a wave function $\psi (x,t)$ that tells how the both position and momentum are distributed at time the $t$. Therefore the state of a particle in quantum mechanics is the corresponding wave function.

In classical mechanics position and momentum tell the definite value of every observable quantity, and in quantum mechanics wave function tells the average value of every observable quantity. Additionally, in quantum mechanics those observable quatities can be discrete or continuous.

A wave function, or a set of wave functions, that corresponds to a particle can be found by solving the Schrödinger equation.

$\endgroup$

protected by Qmechanic Apr 13 '16 at 9:23

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.