In vacuum we have $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac {\rho}{\varepsilon_0}.$$

Can we still use this formula when there's dielectric material in space? Where $\rho$ is total charge density.


There is a modified form of Gauss's law for dielectrics.

Inside a dielectric there is an induced charge that screens the electric field. The bound charge density $\rho_b = - \vec\nabla . \vec P$ where $\vec P$ is the polarisation vector.

This bound charge acts as a source of electric field, so Gauss' law reads

$\vec \nabla . \vec E = \frac{1}{\epsilon_0}(\rho_f + \rho_b)$

We replace the electric field with a so called displacement vector $\vec D = \epsilon_0 \vec E + \vec P$ and thus we can write Gauss' law as

$\vec \nabla . \vec D = \rho_f$

This is the form of Gauss' law to be used inside a dielectric.

See chapter 4 in Griffith's Introduction to Electrodynamics for more information.


| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, so that means the original equation still holds right? Since the new one in dielectric is derived from the old one in vacuum. $\endgroup$ – Salmonella mayonnaise Mar 21 '16 at 21:55
  • $\begingroup$ The original equation is not true inside a dielectric. The presence of the dielectric has changed the electric field. $\endgroup$ – jm22b Mar 21 '16 at 22:08
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm, so what's the basis to derive the new equation since the original one doesn't work anymore in dielectric. $\endgroup$ – Salmonella mayonnaise Mar 21 '16 at 23:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, I think I misunderstood your question. Gauss's law does apply, but you need to take into account both the free and bound charge densities of the dielectric. $\endgroup$ – jm22b Mar 21 '16 at 23:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.