0
$\begingroup$

I don't quite know where to start this question. I'm essentially not understanding how to compute the Lie derivative of a given metric and vector.

So I have the following definition:

$$ \left(\mathcal{L}_{\xi}g\right)_{ab}=\xi^{c}\partial_{c}g_{ab}+g_{cb}\partial_{a}\xi^{c}+g_{ac}\partial_{b}\xi^{c} $$

And say, as an example, I have the following vector (as an example):

$$ \xi^{a}=(\alpha(t,r),\beta(t,r),0,0) $$ So the vector is superscript $a$? This has instantly confused me! My metric is of the form $g_{ab}$, which is consistent with the expression given.

So assuming that I can re-write the above expression as $\xi^{c}$, I'm still lost as to how I proceed with this calculation. What does $\xi^{c}$ correspond to when we have multiple components?

Could anyone give a generalised introduction to how this is computed, where to go with it, and perhaps an example to get me going. (I understand much better with a few examples under my belt).

Maybe if someone could give me the example using the basic FRLW metric $$g_{ab}=diag(1,-a^{2},-a^{2},-a^{2})$$ with the same vector? My actual metric is the following: $$ g_{ab}=diag(-e^{\Phi(r)},(1-b(r)/r)^{-1},r^{2},r^{2}\sin^{2}\theta) $$ But hopefully with the example given I should be able to make a start on this metric.

I am currently at this stage:

$$\left(\mathcal{L}_{\xi}g\right)_{ab}=\xi^{1}(\partial_{1}g_{00}+\partial_{1}g_{11})+2(g_{00}\partial_{0}\xi^{0}+g_{11}\partial_{1}\xi^{1})$$

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ...what has the appearance of the index $a$ in the line before to do with the $a$ on the $\xi^a$? Also, it appears you are either using abstract index notation - because writing $\xi^a = (\xi^0,\xi^1,\xi^2,\xi^3)$ does not make sense if $\xi^a$ is supposed to be a component as in ordinary index notation - or you are misusing index notation. Your problem seems to be less with any specific computation and more with understanding index notation. $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 11:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ unfortunately, the notation $x^\mu=(t,\boldsymbol x)$ is used all the time... $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 11:11
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not misusing it as far as I am aware, this is directly from a question which is being asked. The notation is as written. The vector that is defined as $\xi^{a}$ should that be $\xi^{c}$? That is what I am asking. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 11:11
  • $\begingroup$ Let's just assume this is true, and proceed. This is really possibly just a typo by my lecturer. Would it be possible to run my through then how to calculate an example Lie derivative with the basic FRLW metric given? Hopefully then I can make paths into understand how this is done! $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 11:15
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see a difference between $\xi^a$ and $\xi^c$. $\endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 11:43

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Writing out all the contracted indices often helps and is a good starting point... The only non-zero components of $\xi^c$ is $0$ and $1$, so

$ \xi^c\partial_c g_{ab}+g_{cb}\partial_a\xi^c+g_{ac}\partial_b\xi^c =\xi^0\partial_0 g_{ab}+\xi^1\partial_1 g_{ab}+g_{0b}\partial_a\xi^0+g_{1b}\partial_a\xi^1++g_{a0}\partial_b\xi^0++g_{a1}\partial_b\xi^1 $

Then use that the first two components of $\xi$ are functions of $t$ and $r$, and that your metric is diagonal (only $g_{00}=-e^{\Phi(r)}$, $g_{11}=(1-b(r)/r)^{-1}$ etc. contributes) and its components are functions of $r$. By computing the different derivatives properly and plugging them back into the equation above you should obtain the correct result.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ I have a few questions. Does the 0 indice represent time, $t$ and 1 the radial extent, $r$? So would $\partial_{0}g_{ab}=0$, and then how would I evaluate $\partial_{a}\xi^{1}$ or $\partial_{b}\xi^{1}$? Could you clarify this in your answer if possible...many thanks! :) $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 13:28
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, 0 is time, 1 is radial and so on. You need to be careful when evaluating derivatives of the metric, for example $\partial_0 g_{ab}$ would be nonzero in the FLRW metric, since $g_{11}$ is a function of time.. $\endgroup$
    – Rexbye
    Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ Remember the metric is diagonal, so any of diagonal components are zero. Use $a=b$ and write it out when $a=0$, $a=1$, etc. $\endgroup$
    – Rexbye
    Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 13:46
  • $\begingroup$ So, one more quick question. Apologies, but would $\partial_0g_{ab}$ be zero? Since there is no time-dependence? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 13:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have some stuff i need to attend to through out the day, but i'll give it a quick look when i'm back home tonight. Hopefully someone else can help you as well... $\endgroup$
    – Rexbye
    Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 13:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.