5
$\begingroup$

Why are we taking 2$\theta$ instead of $\theta$ in X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). I have found the forum post 2 theta in X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD), but there is no answer. What is the explanation?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

For the $\theta : 2\theta$ goniometer, the X-ray tube is stationary, the sample moves by the angle $\theta$ and the detector simultaneously moves by the angle $2\theta$. At high values of $\theta$, small or loosely packed samples may have a tendency to fall off the sample holder.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

When you do diffraction, $\theta$ is the angle of incoming EM wave, as well as the angle of difracted EM in regard to Bragg's planes. So the total change in angle of the EM wave equals $2\theta$.

See images at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bragg%27s_law.

If this is not the answer you're looking for, maybe you should specify your question more clearly. (I was doing Bragg's experiments as a student decades ago, I naturally always halfed the angle, so I do not quite understand what is your problem.)

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

In x-ray powder diffraction, you have crystallites in all possible orientations. Only those crystallites whose bragg planes are at an angle θ with respect to the incident angle will diffract at an angle 2θ with respect to the incident beam (or at an angle θ with respect to the diffracting planes). So that is the reason, you always use 2θ instead of θ.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I think the angle $2 \theta$ is used because we can see diffracted pattern from incident beam so the angle of incident and reflected are combine to become $2 \theta$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.