0
$\begingroup$

The de Sitter Universe is described by the Friedmann equation with $k=0$, $\rho=0$ and a positive cosmological constant $\Lambda$:

$$\Big(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\Big)^2=\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}$$

The solution for the scale factor $a(t)$ is given by:

$$a(t) \sim e^{\pm\sqrt{\Lambda c^2/3}\ t}$$

Thus a Universe with a positive cosmological constant $\Lambda$ expands exponentially. I suppose the solution with a negative square root is unphysical.

I understand that it is possible to have an anti-de Sitter Universe with a negative cosmological constant $-\Lambda$.

I have heard people say that such a Universe would shrink exponentially but surely it should oscillate?

$$a(t) \sim e^{\pm i\sqrt{\Lambda c^2/3}\ t}$$

Correction

Andrew pointed out that the metric must be real so that $a(t) \sim e^{iwt}$ is not a legitimate solution.

Instead of the first Friedmann equation I can take the acceleration equation for a de Sitter Universe with positive cosmological constant $\Lambda$ given by:

$$\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}=\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}$$

The solution is given by:

$$a(t) \sim \sinh{\sqrt{\Lambda c^2/3}\ t}$$

Let us consider an anti-de Sitter Universe, with a negative cosmological constant $-\Lambda$. The acceleration equation is given by:

$$\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}=-\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}$$

The real solution to this equation is given by:

$$a(t) \sim \sin{\sqrt{\Lambda c^2/3}\ t}$$

Therefore the anti-de Sitter Universe collapses as expected - not exponentially but like a sine function.

By substituting into the first Friedmann equation one finds that for both anti-de Sitter and de Sitter Universes we have negative spatial curvature $k \sim -\Lambda c^2/3$ (again as pointed out by Andrew).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The oscillatory behavior is present in the final formula for the scale factor(just remember the way you used in electrodynamics the exponential numbers) $\endgroup$ – Mikey Mike Mar 4 '16 at 21:39
  • $\begingroup$ Here the deceleration can be calculated in eq. 32. You can also solve easily the Friedman eqs. numerically using a Runge Kutta. $\endgroup$ – Mikey Mike Mar 4 '16 at 21:42
  • $\begingroup$ It is called anti-de Sitter space $\endgroup$ – Slereah Mar 4 '16 at 21:52
2
$\begingroup$

The metric should be real, so $a(t)\sim e^{i \omega t}$ is not a legitimate solution of Einstein's equations [unless you want to talk about instanton solutions, in which case you are interested in complex geometries, but that is a whole different kettle of fish]. Also note that the Friedman equation is non-linear so you can't just take linear combinations of the positive and negative frequency solutions to make $a$ real.

What you are discovering is that there are no spatially flat slicings of Anti-de Sitter space. Or if you prefer, when $\Lambda<0$ we must also have spatial curvature (in FLRW-type coordinates).

Even if there was no matter, and just a negative CC, the most general form of the Friedman equation following from Einstein's equations is not what you wrote but instead \begin{equation} H^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}\left(-\frac{k}{a^2} + \frac{1}{3}\Lambda\right) \end{equation} where $H=\dot{a}/a$ and $k=+1,-1$, or $0$ tells you if the spatial curvature is positive, negative, or zero.

If we want real solutions of this (which we do) when $\Lambda<0$, then we need $k<0$ which corresponds negative spatial curvature.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.