1
$\begingroup$

I am trying to model the magnetic field of the inner 'disk' of the Milky Way Galaxy. I am following the model of Jansson and Farrar 2012.

In section 5.1.1 of this paper they describe the Milky Way as 8 logarithmic spiral regions with opening angle $i = 11.5^{\circ}$.

In this case, in cylindrical coordinates $(r,\phi,z)$ the dividing lines between these spiral regions is given by

$$ r = r_x \, \text{exp}(\phi \, \text{tan}(90 - i))$$

where $r_x$ is a constant for each spiral arm.

I am confused as to how this equation can describe a full rotation of a spiral arm. For a whole rotation $\phi = 2 \pi$ and so $\text{exp}(\phi \, \text{tan}(90 - i)) \approx e^{30} \approx 10^{13}$. But surely the radius of a spiral arm in the MW does not change by such a huge factor?!

I feel that I am missing something here, and any guidance for what it is would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't the spiral arms of our galaxy are curved so strongly that any of them makes a full rotation (i.e. inserting $\phi = 2\pi$ in there is just unphysical). $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Feb 27 '16 at 13:53
  • $\begingroup$ Notice that in the preceding sentences, they describe the model as working between 5 kpc and 20 kpc. The spiral arms will never curve nearly as much as you say. $\endgroup$ – HDE 226868 Feb 27 '16 at 14:06
1
$\begingroup$

Look at the model in context. In the sentence before giving the values for $r_{-x}$ (which you've written as $r_x$), the authors write

Between radii 5 kpc and 20 kpc there are eight logarithmic spiral regions with opening angle $i = 11.5^{\circ}$.

In other words, the model really only has physical meaning for 5 kpc < $r$ <20 kpc.

Some other things to take into account:

  • This model is only valid for a certain region. While logarithmic spirals can indeed describe spiral arms well, they aren't successful for all values of $r$. For example, they fail to describe the inner region of the disk (i.e. 3-5 kpc).
  • Spiral arms aren't always regular.
  • We don't have a fantastic understanding of the spiral arms of the Milky Way. The 2-arm and 4-arm models are constantly competing with one another, and some minor arms (e.g. the Far 3 kpc Arm; see Dame & Thaddeus (2008)) have been discovered recently.

The important message here, though, is that the spiral arms are limited to main part of the galactic disk, which does not extend to such great distances.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I understand what you are saying, I just have one query that is leaving me confused; in Figure 5 of the paper there is a schematic showing almost total rotation of the arms on a specified small scale? $\endgroup$ – Tom Mar 1 '16 at 7:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Tom I suspect that that is intended to indicate the magnetic field, not necessarily the spiral arms. Note the regularity of the different colored spirals. This is not necessarily the case in spiral arms. But my interpretation could be wrong. $\endgroup$ – HDE 226868 Mar 1 '16 at 22:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.