I often hear: "The degenerate groundstate subspace of a QFT is often a TQFT".
I'm trying to work out an example of this for, say, superconductors: In the context of condensed matter physics, the spacetime of a 2D superconductor is
$$\Sigma\times \mathbb R$$
Where $\Sigma$ is some compact, oriented 2-manifold. Now let's consider the Ginzburg-Landau model, which is a good effective QFT for a superconductor:
$$S_\text{GL}(\phi,A)\equiv \int_{\Sigma\times \mathbb R} (|\nabla^{2A}\phi|^2+|F_A|^2)\,d^3x$$
Now this model has classical solution space $H^1(\Sigma;\mathbb Z_2)$, based off of recognizing that, classically, $\nabla^{2A}$ is a flat spin connection and thus we are just counting spin structures on $\Sigma$. Moreover, this action is supposed to represent, at $T=0$, the groundstate energy of a superconductor.
Anyways, my questions are, (1), does this mean that the classical solutions of the GL model correspond to quantum mechanical groundstates? (2) how is the GL model a topological quantum field theory (because I see a $U(1)$ Yang-Mills term and a Bochner Laplacian)?
If the GL model is a TQFT, then if we write $$Z_\text{GL}(\Sigma\times [0,t])=\int_{C^\infty(\cdots)} D\phi\,DA\, \exp(iS_\text{GL}/\hbar),$$ This is supposed to represent a linear map $U(t):H^1(\Sigma;\mathbb Z_2)\to H^1(\Sigma;\mathbb Z_2)$. However, since we're on a cylinder, the time-evolution should be trivial, no?
Also: Where do we get all the nice quasiparticle braiding? if we add quasiparticles to the action, they certainly do not affect the topology of $\Sigma$ (they're not massive enough). But then, because of diffeomorphism-invariance, quasiparticle processes do not affect the partition function - so we can't switch between groundstates - and so topological quantum computing is impossible!