starting from \begin{align} \epsilon_{\rho\lambda\xi \kappa} R^{\xi \kappa}_{\phantom{ab} \sigma\tau} + \epsilon_{\rho\sigma \xi \kappa} R^{\xi \kappa}_{\phantom{ab} \tau \lambda} + \epsilon_{\rho \tau \xi \kappa} R^{\xi \kappa}_{\phantom{\xi \kappa} \lambda \sigma}=0 \end{align} The paper says, after some simple algebra with the anti-symmetric properties of $\epsilon_{abcd}$ $R_{abcd}$ one can obtain \begin{align} \epsilon_{\rho\lambda \xi \kappa} R^{\xi \kappa}_{\phantom{ab} \sigma \tau} = \epsilon_{\sigma \tau \xi \kappa} R^{\xi \kappa}_{\phantom{ab} \rho \lambda} \end{align}
First my guess was interchange indices $\rho \lambda$ with $\sigma \tau$ with first Bianchi identiy $i.e$ \begin{align} \epsilon_{\rho\lambda\xi \kappa} R^{\xi \kappa}_{\phantom{ab} \sigma \tau} = \epsilon_{\rho\sigma \xi \kappa} ( R^{\xi \phantom{ab} \kappa}_{\phantom{a} \tau \lambda}+R^{\xi \phantom{a} \kappa\phantom{b}}_{\phantom{a} \lambda\phantom{b} \tau}) + \epsilon_{\rho \tau \xi \kappa} ( R^{\xi \phantom{ab} \kappa}_{\phantom{a} \lambda \sigma}+R^{\xi \phantom{a} \kappa\phantom{b}}_{\phantom{a} \sigma\phantom{b} \lambda}) \end{align} and \begin{align} \epsilon_{\sigma\tau\xi \kappa} R^{\xi \kappa}_{\phantom{ab} \rho \lambda} = \epsilon_{\sigma\rho \xi \kappa} ( R^{\xi \phantom{ab} \kappa}_{\phantom{a} \lambda\tau}+R^{\xi \phantom{a} \kappa\phantom{b}}_{\phantom{a} \tau\phantom{b} \lambda}) + \epsilon_{\sigma \lambda \xi \kappa} ( R^{\xi \phantom{ab} \kappa}_{\phantom{a} \tau \rho}+R^{\xi \phantom{a} \kappa\phantom{b}}_{\phantom{a} \rho\phantom{b} \tau}) \end{align}
I can see that the first term of $\epsilon_{\rho\lambda\xi \kappa} R^{\xi \kappa}_{\phantom{ab} \sigma \tau}$ and $\epsilon_{\sigma\tau\xi \kappa} R^{\xi \kappa}_{\phantom{ab} \rho \lambda}$ are equal but the second part seems not equal to each other (it reduce the same form of ideneity we want to prove)
The paper says it is simple computation with the anti-symmetric properties of $\epsilon$ and $R$. If you know how to do this can you give me some hint or some idea?