1
$\begingroup$

I am trying to deduce the Minkowski's dot product for two dimentional space: $$g=x^1y^1-c^2t_xt_y$$ If $f$ denote the Lorentz's transformation for two dimentional case: $$\begin{array}{rcll} f:&\mathbb{R}&\longrightarrow &\mathbb{R}\\ &x&\longmapsto &f(x)=\Lambda x \end{array}\qquad \text{ with }\ \Lambda = \gamma\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 &-v\\ -v/c^2 & 1 \end{array}\right)$$ we have to find a matrix: $$G=\left(\begin{array}{cc} g_{11} & g_{12}\\ g_{21} & g_{22} \end{array}\right)$$ such that $\chi^tG\chi= (\Lambda \chi)^tG(\Lambda \chi)$ or equivalently: $$G=\Lambda ^tG\Lambda$$ we get the system: $$\begin{array}{rlr} \frac{v^2}{c^2}g_{11}-\frac{v}{c^2}g_{12}-\frac{v}{c^2}g_{21}+\frac{v^2}{c^4}g_{22}&=0&(1)\\ -vg_{11}+\frac{v^2}{c^2}g_{12}+\frac{v^2}{c^2}g_{21}-\frac{v}{c^2}g_{22}&=0& (2)\\ -vg_{11}+\frac{v^2}{c^2}g_{12}+\frac{v^2}{c^2}g_{21}-\frac{v}{c^2}g_{22}&=0& (3)\\ v^2g_{12}-vg_{12}-vg_{21}+\frac{v^2}{c^2}g_{22}&=0&(4) \end{array}$$ which is equivalent to: $$\begin{array}{rll} vg_{11}-g_{12}-g_{21}+\frac{v}{c^2}g_{22}&=0\\ c^2g_{11}-vg_{12}-vg_{21}+g_{22}&=0 \end{array}$$ if we denote $g_{21}=\lambda$ and $g_{22}=\mu$, it's easy to prove that: $$G=\left(\begin{array}{cc} -\mu/c^2& -\lambda\\ \lambda &\mu \end{array}\right)$$ As $G$ must be symmetric, $\lambda=0$; so then: $$G=\left(\begin{array}{cc} -\mu/c^2& 0\\ 0 &\mu \end{array}\right)$$ My question is:

How we can get that $\mu$ must be $-c^2$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Minkowski's metric is the definition of Minkowski's metric... What do you want to "deduce" the definition from? The only derivation one can do is from the requirement that c is the same in every inertial system... which leads to the Lorentz transformations and the metric from a physical point of view. c is just a choice of units, anyway, so you might as well make it 1. $\endgroup$
    – CuriousOne
    Commented Jan 31, 2016 at 21:58
  • $\begingroup$ related: Why does the Lorentz transformation in special relativity have to be like this? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 1, 2016 at 21:54
  • $\begingroup$ Hi FUUNK1000. If you haven't already done so, please take a minute to read the definition of when to use the homework-and-exercises tag, and the Phys.SE policy for homework-like problems. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Feb 1, 2016 at 22:00

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You can't deduce this, because all metrics with different $\mu$ are invariant under Lorentz transformations.

The best you can do is to choose the units in which you measure the invariant interval such that $\mu$ is equal to whatever you like it to be.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Actually it is possible to deduce this and is a standard exercise in these lecture notes, see pg.40 after eq. (3.41): users.physics.ox.ac.uk/~smithb/website/coursenotes/rel_A.pdf $\endgroup$
    – udrv
    Commented Feb 4, 2016 at 7:34
  • $\begingroup$ @FUUNK1000 Consider the invariance relationship as applied to the space time-interval: for an event $(ct, x)$ it is known that $(ct, x)G(ct, x)^T = (ct)^2 - x^2$. $\endgroup$
    – udrv
    Commented Feb 4, 2016 at 7:39
  • $\begingroup$ @udrv I dont understand your notation, but consider plugging $2g_{\mu \nu}$ instead of $g_{\mu \nu}$ in your formulas for the invariant interval. What would change exactly? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 10, 2016 at 13:52
  • $\begingroup$ I had in mind matrix notation, with $G$ a $2\times 2$ matrix and $(ct, x)$ as it reads, a 2d row vector. This makes the transposed $(ct, x)^T$ the column vector. Explicitly, $$\left(\begin{array}{cc} ct & x \end{array}\right)\left( \begin{array}{cc} g_{11} & g_{12} \\ g_{21} & g_{22} \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array} {c} ct \\ x \end{array}\right) = (ct)^2 - x^2$$ $\endgroup$
    – udrv
    Commented Feb 10, 2016 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ Then using $g_{\mu\nu} \rightarrow 2g_{\mu\nu}$ or $G \rightarrow 2G$ should give $$2\left(\begin{array}{cc} ct & x \end{array}\right)\left( \begin{array}{cc} g_{11} & g_{12} \\ g_{21} & g_{22} \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array} {c} ct \\ x \end{array}\right) = (ct)^2 - x^2$$ If you have in mind that $G = \Lambda^T G \Lambda$ is invariant under a rescaling of $G$, then yes, the space-time interval condition fixes the metric's scale. $\endgroup$
    – udrv
    Commented Feb 10, 2016 at 15:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.