1
$\begingroup$

let's look at force at the atomic level to understand the newtons third law of motion. I'll use Helium atoms as an example.

Now imagine we start with one atom HE2 stationary, and throw another atom HE1 at it.It is the velocity of HE1 that affects the motion of HE2 , because the system of these two HE2 atoms is isolated , and there is no unbalanced force on each of these . According to physics both the atoms will experience action reaction forces at the same time .

the helium atoms

for sake of simplicity lets consider a imaginary hollow box between the two atoms as an overlapping of their atomic forces. As soon as HE1 moves x distance inside this box , there will be a increase of y amount of velocity in HE2 and a correspoding decrease of y in the velocity of HE1 . But there is still a greater velocity in HE1 as compared to HE2 , so the process of changing of velocities will continue up to the time when both the atoms have the same amount of velocity , because after they attain the same amount of velocity they wont be able to enter tat box again .

So , is what i just explained right ?

i dont think so, because we know from our knowledge of head on elastic collisions of equal masses that when HE1 and HE2 will collide, HE2 will gain the velocity that HE1 had and HE1 will itself become stationary.

so can you please correct me , and provide me with the correct answer to understand the newtons third law of motion ?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Third law is just conservation of linear momentum, so yes, they act simultaneously. Can you explain more your last question? By the way, if you want to learn more about conservation of momentum I suggest you take a look at Noether's Theorem $\endgroup$
    – Suriya
    Commented Jan 24, 2016 at 11:21
  • $\begingroup$ well , my last question was that suppose an object A in motion collides with an object B at rest , then what exactly happens at the atomic level $\endgroup$
    – Faiz Iqbal
    Commented Jan 24, 2016 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe this can help you physics.stackexchange.com/q/188921 $\endgroup$
    – Suriya
    Commented Jan 24, 2016 at 13:51
  • $\begingroup$ Did I answer you the first two questions or do you want to know something more? $\endgroup$
    – Suriya
    Commented Jan 24, 2016 at 13:51
  • $\begingroup$ well , i didnt get you correctly , my doubt still remains unsolved .. the real doubt is how exactly does the third law work at the atomic or molecular stage and will it work at all if the objects that collide are not atoms(if possible at all) .... $\endgroup$
    – Faiz Iqbal
    Commented Jan 24, 2016 at 13:55

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The reason the Newton's law is referred to as the Newton's laws is because the are applicable to newtonian range objects only. The world of quantum mechanics has no relation with the laws of motion at all. The world of quantum mechanics is random and is not predictable, which is a direct violation of the newton's laws.

The point that you make about the force between the Helium atoms is a function of distance between them should be more refined as square of the distance between them as you compare it with a spring.

Let us consider this imaginary assumption of a stationary atom. Which is not possible according to a the laws of quantum mechanics, unless it is in a crystal lattice. But when you throw the another atom at it, The stationary one will feel the repulsion and the moving one also feels the repulsive force no doubt, but the moving one coming to stop and the stationary one moving is not really acceptable, because as soon as the so called stationary atom feels the repulsion it starts the motion in the same direction as that of the moving atom, but moving atom will not come to rest but will surely reduce its motion.

Also the atoms do not move in the newton's world but they have the De'Brogle motion which is of a wave nature and not a straight linear one, so a complex mathematics is required to predict its effect. And the reason I say predict is because it cannot be calculated with absolute precision. So questioning the Newtons third law in the context of a quantum world is not acceptable as it is not meant for it.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ so , what exactly you are saying is that the model for action _reaction forces is different in quantum mechanics than in newton meachanics $\endgroup$
    – Faiz Iqbal
    Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 6:24
  • $\begingroup$ @FaizIqbal in the quantum mechanical regime we have "interactions" and newtons laws emerge macroscopically from a confluence of zillions of interactions ,( remember about 10^23 molecules per mole ). . although there exist fundamental forces, their mathematical expression depends on the postulates of quantum mechanics and not on classical laws. see hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/exchg.html $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 7:16
  • $\begingroup$ @annav thanks very much for the reference but could you please elaborate , so that my doubt gets cleared $\endgroup$
    – Faiz Iqbal
    Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 7:21
  • $\begingroup$ @FaizIqbal If you want to know what a scattering between two quantum mechanical entities will do you have to use the Feynman diagram of the interaction, write in the terms that correspond to the vertices and the exchanged particle ( representing the force) use the wave functions of the system and integrate over the phase space. This will give you the probability of scattering as a function of the particles momentums and angles. So for an single instance you only have a probability of the way the particles will behave. $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 7:57
  • $\begingroup$ continued: in the link hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/particles/expar.html feynman diagrams. $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 8:04

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.