1
$\begingroup$

simple question but I wanted to confirm my approach of thinking about the problem.

Question: A rubber ball is dropped from the fifth story of a building and free falls to the ground, after which it bounces and rises back up to the fifth story (for the sake of argument). What is the acceleration of the ball at the point of the bounce?

My Assumptions:
-The ball is in free fall -There is no air resistance -The collision is perfectly elastic

Initial Attempted Answer and Rationale: -I think it should still be g, i.e. ~ 10 m/s^2 [down] as only gravity is at work.

Conceptual Difficulty: -The ball switches direction of velocity. Let's say the velocity vector of the ball immediately after impact is 5m/s [up], and the velocity vector of the ball immediately before impact is 5m/s [down]. If the velocity vector before impact is subtracted from the vector after impact, the resultant vector points upwards and is twice as long.

Second Attempted Answer and Rationale: -The acceleration of the ball on the ground must be ~20 m/s^2 upwards?

Any clarification on whether the first or second attempted answer is correct would be much appreciated.

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Kyle Kanos, Gert, Kostya, Daniel Griscom, user36790 Jan 24 '16 at 2:20

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – Kyle Kanos, Gert, Kostya, Daniel Griscom, Community
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of Why does a ball bounce? $\endgroup$ – Muze the good Troll. Jan 23 '16 at 21:26
  • $\begingroup$ The acceleration depends on how much the ball and/or the ground deform: The less they deform, the larger the (peak) acceleration the ball experiences to reverse its direction, as it has to stop (and re-accelerate) the ball over a shorter distance. Without further information, your question thus cannot be answered more specifically. $\endgroup$ – Norbert Schuch Jan 23 '16 at 22:47
1
$\begingroup$

The acceleration at the point of reflection is actually quite complicated. It is caused by the elastic forces of the surface and the ball and has a complicated time dependence. However, the timespan in which the ball touches the ground is very short (especially if the ground and the ball are very rigid), therefore we can simplify the actual acceleration curve for kinematic calculations and simply assume that the velocity jumps instantaneously from $v$ to $-v$ in the moment of contact (because the contact with the ground during which this acceleration acts is perhaps on the order of a few millisecons, while we are interested in time scales $\Delta t$ and corresponding length scales $v \Delta t$ a range of seconds).

In this approximation, which is identical to taking the limit of infinite rigidity of ball and surface (formally described by the bulk modulus $E$), the acceleration of the ball is given by $$ a(t) = -g\vec e_z - 2 v(t) \delta(t - t^*), $$ where $t^*$ is the moment of contact.

Here $\delta(t)$ is the so called Dirac delta function, which can be though of as a very narrow but high peak whose integral is one. There are several ways to define the delta function, the most useful one for physicists is the rule $$ \int_{-\infty}^\infty dx\, \delta(x - y) f(y) = f(x) $$ for all functions $f$ (if you do this properly the functions must have some regularity). You can also always think of the $\delta$-function as the limit of narrow peak functions (where you can use any family of peak function you like that have unit area and concentrate more and more around zero): $$ \delta(x) = \lim_{\eta \to 0} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi \eta}} e^{-x^2/\eta} $$ to calculate something rigorously, you have to take the limit after integration (then it will often exist formally, while the $\delta$-function does not exists formally as a limiting function).

Another useful representation of the $\delta$-function comes from the theory of Fourer transformation: $$ \delta(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^\infty dk\, e^{ikx}. $$

With those properties we can simply check that the above acceleration profile gives the result for $v(t)$: \begin{align*} v(t) &= \int_0^t dt\, a(t) = - g t - \int_0^t dt\, 2 v(t) \delta(t - t^*) \\ &= - g t + 2 g t^* \theta(t - t^*). \end{align*} Where $$\theta(t) = \begin{cases} 0 & t < 0 \\ 1 & t > 0 \end{cases} $$ is the Heavyside step function (in short $\theta$-function).

$z(t)$ is given by: $$z(t) = z(0) + \int_0^t v(t) = -\frac 1 2 gt^2 + \theta(t - t^*) 2 g t^* t. $$ Of course, one can proceed to express $t^*$ in terms of the initial height.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.