2
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

I am not an expert of many-worlds interpretation (MWI), and what I say may be stated incorrectly. In that case i welcome corrections. If the MWI is true and it explains quantum theory and it splits for any possible outcome, is there a global amount of energy/mass that is conserved?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by Martin, Kyle Kanos, Qmechanic quantum-mechanics Jan 22 '16 at 12:42

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of Many-worlds: Where does the energy come from? $\endgroup$ – Martin Jan 22 '16 at 11:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You know, what I particularly dislike is when an answer gets closed as a duplicate, and the answer on the duplicate is some pseudoscience tosh non-answer: "There is no energy required to do that". What utter twaddle. Utmost apologies, user. As per Killercam's comment on the alleged duplicate, the question you raise is a good one and is precisely the reason why the many world interpretation is flawed. $\endgroup$ – John Duffield Jan 22 '16 at 14:47
  • $\begingroup$ The MWI does not "explain" quantum theory. It does explain the measurement process wrong, though. You can toss it into the dustbin on science history. It's no wonder, by the way, that it's "inventor" never did anything important in physics other than being tied to this intellectual nonsense. $\endgroup$ – CuriousOne Jan 22 '16 at 16:37
-1
$\begingroup$

Lets say you take the theoretical function multiverse and use eulrtivic manifold distribution of stellar parallax (EMDSP equations) to find the conserved mass/energy of the two variables (energy, mass/consequence of gravitational flux) then one should find a percentage of mass being quite content and conserved.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ could you elborate please ? do you have some refs for eulrvitic and EMDSP equations. Just to understand the relation to MWI ... TY $\endgroup$ – user46925 Jan 22 '16 at 14:11

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.