2
$\begingroup$

So the Casimir effect is caused by an imbalance in radiation pressure(caused by virtual particles) on two sides of a metal plate. This is typically shown with two close plates getting pushed towards each other. The net force these two plates experience towards each other increases as they get closer. This is because as they get closer there are less virtual particles hitting the inner sides of the plates and around the same amount of virtual particles hitting the outer sides of the plates.

I decided to take this idea a bit further by adding a third plate in between the other two plates. The forces on the middle plate caused by virtual particles should cancel out. The outer plates however experience a greater imbalance in radiation pressure as less virtual particles are hitting the inner side of the plate. Thus the addition of the third plate brings the outer plates closer together. This is illustrated in the GIF below.

Casimir effect with 3 plates

Lets say the third(middle) plate was rectangular and on a pivot(in a zero-friction environment) so that as it rotated the third plate went from being between the two plates to not being between them periodically. This would mean the outer two plates would constantly be changing in distance from each other. Such a motion could be exploited to create really really small amounts of energy via piezoelectric materials or the plates pushing/pulling pistons. I don't see how the harvesting of this energy from the outer plates could possibly slow down the rotation of the third plate because the Casimir effect doesn't work that way. This means you could do this forever to create infinite energy really slowly. Where is the flaw in my logic?

Also correct me if I used the wrong terminology.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you need the Casimir effect for this? Why wouldn't two gas reservoirs with a membrane between them do the trick? Is it because mentioning "Casimir effect" sounds more magical? So why doesn't this work with gas reservoirs? $\endgroup$
    – CuriousOne
    Jan 22, 2016 at 5:57
  • $\begingroup$ If you had 2 paper plates up next to each other the air wouldn't make them get pushed towards each other. If they were metal plates then the Casimir effect would push them together. So two gas reservoirs with a membrane between them wouldn't do the trick. I also didn't mention the Casimir effect to make this sound magical. $\endgroup$
    – Laff70
    Jan 22, 2016 at 6:16
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe the motivation is that since the Casimir force depends on zero temperature properties of QFT vacua it could be viewed as being more fundamental, in a purely physical certain sense. Mathematically the two scenarios are essentially the same. At a physical level, the statistical system allows a 'Maxwell demon' that would be more difficult to implement in the quantum case. $\endgroup$
    – TLDR
    Jan 22, 2016 at 6:23
  • $\begingroup$ The Casimir effect works the same way as any other thermodynamic reservoir, including a gas filled one. So why invoke the magic instead of the ordinary? $\endgroup$
    – CuriousOne
    Jan 22, 2016 at 6:42
  • $\begingroup$ where is the pivot in your gif ?, where would the energy for rotating the central plate come from? are you depending on non-friction? $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Jan 22, 2016 at 6:43

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
5
$\begingroup$

The third plate will be attracted into the gap between the two outer plates so you get work, $E_\text{in}$, as the third plate moves into the gap. Then you have to do work, $E_\text{out}$, to pull the third plate out of the gap again. If the two outer plates stay fixed then the two amounts of work are equal:

$$ E_\text{out} = E_\text{in} $$

and energy is neither created nor destroyed. So far so good.

Now put the third plate in the gap, and get energy $E_\text{in}$, then let the outer plates move inwards under the Casimir force getting more work $E_\text{gap}$. The trouble is that you have increased the attraction of the third plate into the gap, so it now takes a higher energy $E'_\text{out} \gt E_\text{out}$ to pull the plate out again. You'll find that:

$$ E'_\text{out} = E_\text{in} + E_\text{gap} $$

and the net energy you got out is still zero.

Putting the plate into the gap is analogous to putting the plate into a region of lower pressure. When you bring the two outer plates together you are in effect lowering the pressure further. So your idea is like putting the plate into a low pressure area but having to pull it out of a lower still pressure area.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting. I did not know the Casimir effect worked like that. Mind giving me a source so I can verify this? If not I'll research this more and if I find you're right I'll mark your answer as the accepted answer. $\endgroup$
    – Laff70
    Jan 22, 2016 at 6:22
  • $\begingroup$ One subtlety: normally the above result would follow from the adiabatic theorem. Physically, this is reasonable since one would expect radiation to be negligible when the rate of change is small enough. To be thorough though, you would need to control the energy lost/gained from radiation. $\endgroup$
    – TLDR
    Jan 22, 2016 at 6:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.