Clarification about two forms of the wave function The wave function in the position representation is $\langle\ x\rvert\psi\rangle$ = $ \psi (x) $ , where $ \psi (x) $ are the continuous coefficients that multiply the orthonormal basis vectors, i.e, $\rvert\psi\rangle$ = $ \psi (x) $$\rvert\ x \rangle$,  and $\rvert\psi\rangle$ is the generic state vector . However in some cases I see the $\rvert\psi\rangle$ represented as a column vector as \begin{pmatrix}
\psi_1(x,t)\  \\
\psi_2(x,t)\   \\
\psi_3(x,t)
\end{pmatrix}
$\psi_1 $, $\psi_2 $, $\psi_3 $ may themselves be continuous, but the column vector seems to indicate that the state vector is a discrete sum of all individual $\psi $  s times the basis vectors. 
First of all I find it difficult to grasp that the state vector is a discrete sum of continuous wave functions. Is this done to indicate that a stationary state is not possible, only a linear combination of a bunch of stationary states is physically acceptable? In that case isn't it an integral rather than a sum?
 A: Such a vector describes the quantum state of a spin-1 particle on a line, or any other particle with a position degree of freedom and 3 internal states.
To start with, you can expand wavefunctions in a basis.  E.g., if you have a wavefunction $\vert\psi\rangle$ which depends on position, you can expand it in the position basis $\vert x \rangle_p$, i.e., write
$$
\vert\psi\rangle = \int \psi(x)\vert x\rangle_\mathrm{p} \mathrm{d}x\ ,
$$
where $\psi(x)=\langle x\vert\psi\rangle$.  One also often just writes $\psi(x)$ in that case.
Now if you have a quantum state which does not depend on position, but e.g. on some internal degree of freedom $s=0,...,S-1$ (e.g., a spin being $+1$, $0$, or $-1$), then you might write
$$
\vert\psi\rangle = \sum_{\sigma=0}^{S-1} \psi_\sigma \vert\sigma\rangle_\mathrm{s}\ ,
$$
where $\psi_\sigma = \langle \sigma \vert\psi \rangle$.  (Clearly, the spin basis $\vert \sigma \rangle_s$ has nothing to do with the position basis $\vert x \rangle_\mathrm{p}$ -- one has to be careful here, and notation is often sloppy.)
Given that $\sigma$ has a discrete number of settings, this is often written as a vector with $S$ components, e.g. for $S=3$
$$
\vert\psi\rangle = \left(\begin{matrix} \psi_0\\\psi_1\\\psi_2
\end{matrix}\right)\ .
$$
Now imagine you have an object which has both position and spin (e.g., a spin-1 particle, which has 3 spin states).  Then, it can be written as
$$
\vert\psi\rangle = \int\mathrm{d}x \sum_{\sigma=0}^{S-1} \psi_\sigma(x) (\vert\sigma\rangle_\mathrm{s}\otimes \vert x\rangle_\mathrm{p})\ ,
$$
or as 
$$
\vert\psi\rangle = \left(\begin{matrix} \psi_0(x)\\\psi_1(x)\\\psi_2(x)
\end{matrix}\right)\ .
$$
Thus, your vector describes the quantum state of a particle with some position and 3 internal states (e.g., a spin-1 particle on a line).
