Vector operators $\vec{V}$ in quantum mechanics are usually defined as those that commute in a particular way with the spatial Angular Momentum $\vec{L}$: $[L_i,V_j]=i\hbar\varepsilon_{ijk}V_k$. I am not aware of a more general definition, but can we define some sort of "vectoriality" with respect to spin angular momentum (or any set of operators such that $[J_i,J_j]=i\hbar\varepsilon_{ijk}J_k$)?

Is it correct to think that the "vectorial"(or even "tensorial") property of operators is valid for each one of the tensor spaces ($\mathcal{E}_{spatial}\otimes\mathcal{E}_{spin}\otimes \cdots$) available once "spin" degrees of freedom have been added? Maybe there is even some sort of "tensoriality" with respect to a more general algebra of commutation.


1 Answer 1


The notion of vector operator makes sense when the Hilbert space admits a preferred strongly continuous unitary representation of $SU(2)$ which leaves invariant the space. Every such representation admits 3 selfadjoint generators $J_i$ with $i=1,2,3$. Then the condition you wrote, that a triple of operators $V_i$, defined on a common subspace invariant under the representation, is equivalent to $$U_u V_i U_u^{-1} = \sum_{j=1}^3R_{ij}(u) V_j$$ where $R(u)$ is the standard orthogonal matrix associated to every element $u\in SU(2)$. In that sense the triple of operators $V_i$ transforms how components of vectors in the physical space. This definition can be applied once you have a representation of $SU(2)$ acting on a Hilbert space. It does not matter if the generators represent the angular momentum or the spin etc...


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.