How do we imagine a Hadamard gate acting on the Bloch Sphere? We can rewrite the Hadamard gate as $R_x(-\pi/2)R_z(-\pi/2)R_x(-\pi/2)$. I am trying to visualize the effect of applying the Hadamard gate to $|+\rangle$ on the Bloch sphere.
The X gate takes $|+\rangle$ to $|+\rangle$. The Z gate takes $|+\rangle$ to $|-\rangle$. The last X gate takes $|-\rangle$ to $|-\rangle$ (ignoring the phase factors).
I know that the effect of Hadamard on $|+\rangle$ is $|0\rangle$.
I am trying to imagine a clockwise rotation of $\pi$/2 about the X "axis" on the Bloch sphere, followed by a clockwise rotation of $\pi$/2 about the Z "axis", followed by a $\pi$/2 about the X "axis".
Please advise my error. I have read up on wikipedia and StackExchange regarding the Bloch sphere and rotations. I am trying to use this understanding to find the Z-Y decomposition of the Hadamard gate, and use that decomposition to find $U=e^(i\alpha)AXBXC$ for the Hadamard gate.
The corollary of $U=e^(i\alpha)R_n(\beta)R_m(\gamma)R_n(\delta)$).
 A: The Hadamard gate is a 180 degree rotation around the diagonal X+Z axis of the Bloch sphere.
Terrible picture (from a blog post):

In the diagram the |0> state is at the top (+Z) of the sphere and the |0>+|1> state is at the front (+X). Rotating around the back-bottom-to-front-top axis (X=Z,Y=0) moves the top point (|0>) to the front point (|0>+|1>) and cycle. And this same operation will move the bottom point (|1>) to the back point (|0>-|1>) and cycle. Just like the Hadamard gate.
Global Phase Matters
The second part of your question is about emulating this rotation using only rotations around the X and Z axis.
The construction you give is X-rot 90°, Z-rot 90°, X-rot 90°. But don't forget to include the phase correction term! The Bloch sphere doesn't track the global phase factor, which is usually fine since it only matters when you're performing a controlled operation, but your particular case does involve controls. That $e^{i\alpha}$ term, which ends up being an $R_z$ gate on the control wire of your construction, is important.
(If you wanted to get the phase right without that term, you could use a longer construction such as $H = X^{-0.5} \cdot Z^{-0.25} \cdot X \cdot Z^{0.25} \cdot X^{0.5}$, although then placing intermediate NOTs won't turn it into an identity operation.)
Verifying the Combined Rotation
A quick way to convince yourself that a combination of rotations matches some desired rotation is to track what it does to each of the six cardinal points. Any rotation that gets all of them right has to be correct for all the other points.
Based on what the Hadamard operation does: we want the top and front points to switch places, the bottom and back points to switch places, and the left and right points to switch places. Your sequence of moves does in fact do that.
