2
$\begingroup$

The problem is:

The solid cylindrical platform with mass $M$ and radius $R$ rotates with angular frequency $\omega$. On the edge of the platform there is a standing man with mass $m$. Then man begins to walk round the edge with velocity $v$ in the opposite direction of platform's rotation. And the task is to find new frequency $\omega '$.

So, I thought that the equation for this problem is

$$(I_{plat} + I_{man}) \ \omega = I_{plat} \ \omega ' + I_{man}\ (\omega ' - \frac{v}{R})$$ where $I$ is a moment of inertia. Equation is written in the inertial system.

But with this equation the result is like $\omega ' < 0$, so it begins to rotate in the opposite direction, it looks weird (with given values of parameters). And I was told that this equation is incorrect.

So, where did I do a mistake?

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by John Rennie, Kyle Kanos, Daniel Griscom, Martin, Norbert Schuch Jan 8 '16 at 12:35

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – John Rennie, Kyle Kanos, Daniel Griscom, Martin, Norbert Schuch
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Hi and welcome to the Physics SE! Please note that this is not a homework help site. Please see this Meta post on asking homework questions and this Meta post for "check my work" problems. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jan 8 '16 at 11:12
  • $\begingroup$ Is $\omega'$ supposed to be the new frequency of the man or the platform? Your expression looks correct for the platform... And if the man walks at a velocity that cancels $\omega'$ exactly, the platform must be rotating much faster to carry all the angular momentum. I don't see how $\omega'$ would go negative for positive $v$. Who told you that you were wrong? $\endgroup$ – Floris Jan 8 '16 at 13:18