2
$\begingroup$

In quantum mechanics $A$ and $B$ can be simultaneous measured if mathematically $\hat{A}\hat{B}=\hat{B}\hat{A}$. But how do we actually measure thing simultaneously. $\hat{A}\hat{B}$ is not simultaneous measurement because because here we measure $B$ and then $A$. So the above mathematical equation only tells us that $\hat{A}\hat{B}$ ($B$ first, $A$ later) = $\hat{B}\hat{A}$ ( $A$ first, $B$ later) - how does this relate to simultaneous measurement?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I don't understand your question. You can't measure observables that don't commute "simultaneously", only in succession, and then it's your choice in which order ($XP$ or $PX$) you do that. What are you trying to ask? $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Dec 26 '15 at 14:43
  • $\begingroup$ say A and B are commutable, then how do I measure it simultaneously, because the only measurement I can do is AB or BA which are not simultaneous but comes one after another. $\endgroup$ – Manish Kumar Singh Dec 26 '15 at 14:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ ...if they commute, $AB = BA$, so it doesn't matter. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Dec 26 '15 at 15:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ First, you say we can't do simultaneous measurement. Then you ask how to do it. Didn't you already give the answer? You can't. $\endgroup$ – Peter Shor Dec 26 '15 at 19:12
  • $\begingroup$ @PeterShor my question was if you are able to do simultaneous measurement, how do you do it, if its AB then its not simultaneous as B comes before A. $\endgroup$ – Manish Kumar Singh Dec 26 '15 at 19:16
5
$\begingroup$

simultaneous measurement doesn't mean that commuting operators are measured simultaneously (in time, as you asked in question) and not one by one. It means that when the two operators commute, then they are diagonal in the same ket basis, which are referred to as simultaneous eigenkets, and you can now measure them one by one without disturbing the collapsed state vector. The fact that they are diagonal in the basis of same eigenkets allows them to be measured simultaneously without disturbing the state vector. Now coming to your example of two commuting operators, it does not matter in which order you measure the operators, since the two operators commute with each other. You can measure them like $ XY$ or $YX$.

And simultaneous measurement is not prohibited by quantum mechanics. It is prohibited for those operators that don't obey commutation relations and thus are not diagonal in the same ket basis, and therefore the state vector is disturbed each time they are measured. A famous example is that of position and momentum, they have a non-zero commutator and thus cannot be measured simultaneously.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You can also actually measure commuting observables simultaneously, e.g., by doing a projective measurement in a joint eigenbasis of both operators. $\endgroup$ – Norbert Schuch Dec 27 '15 at 1:11
  • $\begingroup$ i was clarifying the apparent misunderstanding raised in the question when i said "simultaneous measurement doesn't mean that commuting operators are measured simultaneously". it seemed that the guy was confusing simultaneity in time for simultaneous measurements as deduced from the comments section. $\endgroup$ – Bruce Lee Dec 27 '15 at 1:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.