Field theory: equivalence between Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulation Let $\mathscr{B}$ be a space of physics we have and $\mathscr{T}$ be the duration. 
Let $\mathscr{L}$ be a lagrangian density of the field such that the action is a functional of $\phi:\mathbb{R}^4\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$:
$$S=\int_{\mathscr{B}
\times\mathscr{T}}d^4x\mathscr{L}(\phi(t,\vec{x}),\partial_\mu\phi(t,\vec{x})).\tag{1}$$
We can then derive the equations of motion: 
$$\frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi}=0.\tag{2}$$
Otherwise we can define the hamiltonian density $$\mathscr{H}=\pi\dot\phi-\mathscr{L}=\mathscr{H}(\pi,\phi,\partial_i\phi)\tag{3}$$ whereas $$\pi=\frac{\partial\mathscr{L}}{\partial\dot\phi}\tag{4}$$ and $i=1.2.3$. Then the hamiltonian is a functional of $(\mathbb{R}^3\rightarrow\mathbb{R})$:
$$H(t)=\int_\mathscr{B} d^3x\mathscr{H}.\tag{5}$$
Let $\phi(t)$ and $\pi(t)$ be 2 functions $\mathbb{R}^3\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$. We define the Poisson bracket for 2 functionals $A[\phi,\pi]$ and $B[\phi,\pi]$:
$$\{A,B\}=\frac{\delta A}{\delta\pi}\frac{\delta B}{\delta\phi}-\frac{\delta A}{\delta\phi}\frac{\delta B}{\delta\pi}\tag{6}$$
and we have the canonical relation (for $t,\vec{x},\vec{y}$ fixed):
$$\{\pi(t,\vec{x}),\phi(t,\vec{y})\}=\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{y}).\tag{7}$$
How can we show that the equation of motions is now
$$\dot\pi=\{H,\pi\};\dot\phi=\{H,\phi\}~?\tag{8}$$
 A: First, note that the EOM are the Euler-Lagrange equations:
$$
\frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi}=\partial_\mu\left(\frac{\partial \mathscr L}{\partial\phi_{,\mu}}\right)-\frac{\partial \mathscr L}{\partial \phi}=\dot\pi+\partial_i\left(\frac{\partial \mathscr L}{\partial\phi_{,i}}\right)-\frac{\partial \mathscr L}{\partial \phi}
$$
where I isolated the $\mu=0$ term, and used the definition of $\pi$.
Next, use $\mathscr L=\pi\dot\phi-\mathscr H$:
$$
\frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi}=\dot\pi+\partial_i\left(\frac{\partial \mathscr L}{\partial\phi_{,i}}\right)-\frac{\partial \mathscr L}{\partial \phi}=\dot\pi-\partial_i\left(\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial\phi_{,i}}\right)+\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial \phi}=\dot\pi+\frac{\delta H}{\delta \phi}
$$
because $\pi$ and $\dot\phi$ are not functions of $\phi$.
Thus, we get $\dot\pi=-\frac{\delta H}{\delta\phi}=\{H,\pi\}$.
The other relation is easier: 
$$
\{H,\phi\}=\frac{\delta \mathscr  H}{\delta \pi}
$$
Next, use $\mathscr H=\pi\dot\phi-\mathscr L$:
$$
\{H,\phi\}=\frac{\delta \mathscr  H}{\delta \pi}=\dot\phi
$$
because $\mathscr  L$ is not a function of $\pi$.
ADDENDUM
Let $f(\phi,\pi)$ and $g(\phi,\pi)$ be two function on "Phase space". Then, by definition,
$$
\{f(\boldsymbol x),g(\boldsymbol y)\}\equiv\int\mathrm d\boldsymbol z\ \frac{\delta f(\boldsymbol x)}{\delta \phi(\boldsymbol z)}\frac{\delta g(\boldsymbol y)}{\delta \pi(\boldsymbol z)}-\frac{\delta g(\boldsymbol y)}{\delta \phi(\boldsymbol z)}\frac{\delta f(\boldsymbol x)}{\delta \pi(\boldsymbol z)}
$$
where everything is evaluated at the same time $t$ (not writen for clarity). This means that
$$
\{H(t),\pi(t,\boldsymbol x)\}=\int\mathrm d\boldsymbol z\ \frac{\delta H(t)}{\delta \phi(\boldsymbol z)}\frac{\delta \pi(\boldsymbol x)}{\delta \pi(\boldsymbol z)}-\frac{\delta \pi(\boldsymbol x)}{\delta \phi(\boldsymbol z)}\frac{\delta H(t)}{\delta \pi(\boldsymbol z)}=\int\mathrm d\boldsymbol z\ \frac{\delta H(t)}{\delta \phi(\boldsymbol z)}\delta(\boldsymbol x-\boldsymbol z)
$$
which equals $\frac{\delta H}{\delta \phi}$, as expected.
ADDENDUM II
Proof of $\frac{\delta H}{\delta \phi}=\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial \phi}-\partial_i\left(\frac{\partial\mathscr H}{\partial\phi_{,i}}\right)$:
The dynamical variables of the Lagrangian are $\phi$ and $\partial_\mu\phi$. In the Hamiltonian formulation, we change $\partial_0\phi\leftrightarrow\pi$, so that the dynamical variables of the Hamiltonian are $\phi,\,\partial_i\phi$ and $\pi$. 
With this in mind, the Hamiltonian is, by definition,
$$
H=\int\mathrm d\boldsymbol x\ \mathscr H(\phi(\boldsymbol x),\phi_{,i}(\boldsymbol x),\pi(\boldsymbol x))
$$
Therefore,
$$
\delta H=\int\mathrm d\boldsymbol x\ \delta\mathscr H(\phi(\boldsymbol x),\phi_{,i}(\boldsymbol x),\pi(\boldsymbol x))
$$
where
$$
\delta\mathscr H(\phi,\phi_{,i},\pi)=\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial \phi}\delta\phi+\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial \phi_{,i}}\delta\phi_{,i}+\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial\pi}\delta\pi
$$
Next, as we want $\frac{\delta H}{\delta \phi}$, we want to leave $\pi$ unchanged, so $\delta\pi=0$ (this is analogous to ordinary partial derivatives: when you calculate $\frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial x}$ you want to make a small displacement of $x$, while leaving $y$ unchanged)$\phantom{}^1$.
Anyway, in the integral over $\mathrm d\boldsymbol x$, we can integrate by parts the $\delta \phi_{,i}=\partial_i\delta \phi$ to make the derivative act on $\frac{\partial\mathscr H}{\partial\phi_{,i}}$:
$$
\delta\mathscr H(\phi,\phi_{,i},\pi)=\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial \phi}\delta\phi-\partial_i\left(\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial \phi_{,i}}\right)\delta\phi+\text{surface terms}
$$
Finally, back to $H$:
$$
\delta H=\int\mathrm d\boldsymbol x\ \left(\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial \phi}-\partial_i\left(\frac{\partial \mathscr H}{\partial \phi_{,i}}\right)\right)\delta\phi
$$
where I assumed that surface terms dont contribute. The expression in the parentheses is, by definition, the functional derivative of $H$ w.r.t. $\phi$.
$\phantom{}^1$: If we took $\delta\pi\neq 0$ and $\delta\phi=0$, we would get $\frac{\delta H}{\delta \pi}$ instead. All this is possible because the system is unconstrained, which is not true in some theories (such as the Dirac Lagrangian); in these cases, you can't use Poisson brackets, but Dirac brackets instead.
