3
$\begingroup$

Please provide some theoretical procedure which equates Biot-Savart law with the Maxwell's 4th equation for steady current, which is Ampere's law $$\quad \nabla\times{\bf B} = \mu_0{\bf J}.$$

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Let me answer the second query.

We know $$\mathbf{ B}=\text{curl}\;\mathbf{ A} $$ where $\bf B$ is the magnetic field & $\bf A$ is vector-potential.

Now, using Maxwell's equation, we get $$\text{curl}\;(\text{curl}\; \mathbf A)= \mu_0 \mathbf J . $$ By cracking a bit-algebra, we get, $$-\frac{\partial^2 A_x}{\partial x^2}-\frac{\partial^2 A_x}{\partial y^2}- \frac{\partial^2 A_x}{\partial z^2} +\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial A_y}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial z}\right)= \mu_0 J_x.$$

Now, for convenience, we take $\text{div}\; \mathbf A= 0\; .$

This makes the above relation looks like $$-\frac{\partial^2 A_x}{\partial x^2}-\frac{\partial^2 A_x}{\partial y^2}- \frac{\partial^2 A_x}{\partial z^2} = \mu_0 J_x\;.$$ The vector potential at $(x_1,y_1,z_1)$ is then given by $$\mathbf A(x_1,y_1,z_1)= \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int \frac{\mathbf{J}(x_2,y_2,z_2)\;\mathrm dv_2}{r_{12}}\;.$$

Now, consider a loop of wire carrying current $I$.

Now, $\mathrm{d} v_2= a\; \mathrm{d} l$ where $\mathrm dl$ is an infinitesimal section of the wire; $\mathbf{J} \; \mathrm{d} v_2= I\; \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} .$

Therefore our vector-potential for the thin-wire carrying steady current is given by $$\mathbf A= \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi}\int \frac{\mathrm d\mathbf l}{r_{12}}.$$

Let us focus on that section of wire which happens to let the current in the $\hat{\mathbf x}$ direction & is located at the origin of our frame.

Then at a certain point $(x,y)$ in $xy$ plane, contribution to the vector-potential from the infinitesimal wire-section at the origin is given by $$\mathrm{d}\mathbf A= \hat{\mathbf x} \;\frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi} \frac{\mathrm{d}\mathbf l}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}} \;.$$

Since, $\mathbf A$ is in $xy$ plane, its curl must point in the $\hat{\mathbf z}$ direction. therefore, \begin{align}\mathrm{d}\mathbf B &= \text{curl}\;\mathrm{d}\mathbf A\\& =\hat{\mathbf z}\left(-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}\right)\\ &= \hat{\mathbf z}\;\frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi} \frac{ \mathrm{d} l\; y}{(x^2 + y^2)^{3/2}}\\ &= \hat{\mathbf z}\;\frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi} \frac{\mathrm{d}l\; \sin\varphi}{r^2}\;. \end{align}

Now, that being deduced, we can say that this would be valid for any general coordinate system; all that matters is the relative orientation of the element $d\mathbf l$, radius vector $\bf r$ from the element to the concerned point.

The contribution to the magnetic field from any element of wire can be taken to be a vector perpendicular to the plane containing $\mathrm{d} \mathbf l$ & $\bf r$ & the angle between them namely $\varphi\; .$

This can be compactly written as $${\mathrm{d}\mathbf B= \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{I\; \mathrm{d}\mathbf l \times \hat{ \mathbf r}}{r^2}}\; .$$ And this is Biot-Savart Law, which you wanted.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can Mr. Downvoter please tell me how can I please him? For I'm not an AI that can decipher the reason for the discontentment. $\endgroup$ – user36790 Mar 3 '16 at 12:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.