2
$\begingroup$

Is there a physical reason why AFM cantilevers are driven below their resonance frequencies?

In all of the AFMs I have used, once you measure the resonance frequency of the cantilever, it is set up to be driven slightly below this frequency for measurement. Is this a convention? Does driving at resonance cause damage? If not, then why is the cantilever not also driven above resonance? I seem to recall an engineer telling me that driving below resonance improves the resolution and referenced a paper - but I can't find this.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The resonance curve is a Lorentzian shape (which looks similar to a Gaussian bell-shaped curve). When the slope of the Lorentzian is at a maximum (i.e. slightly off resonance), the driven system will be most sensitive to changes in the resonant frequency. In the linked article, notice that the amplitude $A_0$ is marked on the steep part of the Lorentzian, which makes $A_+$ and $A_-$ very different from $A_0$. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-contact_atomic_force_microscopy#Amplitude_modulation

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ But why below resonance and not above? Also, why is the resonance Gaussian? Resonances are so often Lorentzian... $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Dec 3 '15 at 6:02
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know why below resonance. Maybe the idea is to try to avoid going to large amplitude as you near the surface, risking a crashed tip. $\endgroup$ – Spirko Dec 3 '15 at 6:10
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it's probably Lorentzian. Looking at the driven damped harmonic oscillator, that looks more appropriate. $\endgroup$ – Spirko Dec 3 '15 at 6:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.