11
$\begingroup$

Supposing I want to make a quantum joke, like writing this on a coffee machine:

$$| \text{Status}\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\ \big( | \text{Working}\rangle \color{red}{\pm} | \text{Down}\rangle \big) \, ,$$

should I choose the $\color{red}{+}$ or the $\color{red}{-}$ sign, or is it the same? Why?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The sign indicates singlet/triplet states. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Nov 29 '15 at 15:43
  • $\begingroup$ Well, if all you're going to do is make a direct measurement of whether you're working or down, the sign doesn't matter for the outcome. $\endgroup$ – march Nov 29 '15 at 15:46
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ States don't have to be normalised. So you don't need the root two. But it adds a nice touch, a note of misplaced precision.... By the same token, you could multiply |working> by the imaginary unit $i$ to suggest that the status is a complicated affair, and the idea that it would be working is purely imaginary.... $\endgroup$ – joseph f. johnson Nov 29 '15 at 19:12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As someone who is not familiar with quantum physics, this joke gives me a headache, along with the answers. Could someone give me a <500 chars explanation of this joke? $\endgroup$ – Nzall Nov 29 '15 at 22:16
  • 13
    $\begingroup$ @NateKerkhofs Understanding quantum physics doesn't make it funny either. $\endgroup$ – Norbert Schuch Nov 29 '15 at 23:32
11
$\begingroup$

The signs are important for fixing an out of order machine. Define the states $|\pm\rangle$ as:

$$|\pm\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left[\left |\text{Working}\right\rangle\pm \left |\text{Down}\right\rangle\right]$$

And we define the observable $O$ as:

$$O = |+\rangle\langle + |\ - \ |-\rangle\, \langle -|$$

Suppose then that coffee machine is out of order. To fix it, you measure $O$ and then you measure if it is working, if not you repeat the procedure of measuring $O$ and then checking if it is working. At each step you have 50% probability that it will be found to be working.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ quantum machines seem to be really easy to fix via brute force! $\endgroup$ – diffeomorphism Nov 29 '15 at 18:14
  • $\begingroup$ Awesome answer! Ahaha nice! $\endgroup$ – Les Adieux Nov 29 '15 at 19:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ How does the protocol for fixing the machine depend on whether the machine starts in state $|+\rangle$ or $|-\rangle$? $\endgroup$ – Vectornaut Nov 30 '15 at 4:38
2
$\begingroup$

Perhaps you don't want a quantum superposition, but just a statistical mixture:

$$\rho = \begin{pmatrix}1/2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1/2\end{pmatrix}$$

Although I'm not 100% sure that this will describe your situation any better...

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

If you want to declare indeterminacy and a probability of being either working or down you should use the vector notation:

       (working )

Status> =

       ( down)

Status being the column vector analogous to the column state vector of the wavefunction in a matrix representation

The user would be the operator :)

$\endgroup$

protected by Qmechanic Nov 29 '15 at 19:24

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.