I'm a noob when it comes to physics and most of my knowledge of physics comes from popular science; it's more likely that I'm wrong than not about this.

From what I've understood; Matter and anti-matter are opposites of each other and should annihilate each other

For every particle there apparently exists an opposite; for instance electron <-> anti-electron (or positron), proton <-> anti-proton and so on. The ability to annihilate makes the assumption that the structure of anti-matter is the same as that of matter (positrons on the outside and anti-protons and anti-neutrons in the inside).

However, if you are to invert this structure then these particles wouldn't be able to annihilate each other but instead repel each other away [anti-protons on the outside and positrons and anti-neutrons forming the core]. This would imply that anti-matter and matter repel each other. This could (maybe) explain the accelerating universe.

Have there been any theories along these lines?


closed as off-topic by Alfred Centauri, Kyle Kanos, Gert, user36790, John Rennie Nov 28 '15 at 7:09

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "We deal with mainstream physics here. Questions about the general correctness of unpublished personal theories are off topic, although specific questions evaluating new theories in the context of established science are usually allowed. For more information, see Is non mainstream physics appropriate for this site?." – Alfred Centauri, Kyle Kanos, Community, John Rennie
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


Anti-matter atoms cannot be formed with nuclei of positrons for the same reason that normal-matter atoms can't have nuclei of electrons: the massive particles will define the effective center. The mass-ratio of anti-protons to anti-electrons is exactly the same as that of protons to electrons --- so they maintain the same structure.

  • $\begingroup$ Massive particles define the center, this is true of matter, but do we know why? $\endgroup$ – GeneralBecos Nov 28 '15 at 19:41
  • $\begingroup$ @GeneralBecos Because they are massive. 2000 times more massive than the electrons/positrons. They define the center of mass, and thus the dynamical center of the system. $\endgroup$ – DilithiumMatrix Nov 28 '15 at 20:02
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @DilithiumMatrix. In theory, Neutrons + electrons, could form the center, with protons outside. A more dynamic system like standard candle supernovae could exist. That aside; I don't know for certain if standard principles of mechanics (dynamic systems) apply at the level of atoms. I could be wrong. Any references would be very welcome. Thanks again for taking the time to respond. $\endgroup$ – GeneralBecos Nov 28 '15 at 20:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Timaeus: Thank you. I'll read up about the strong force. Also I didn't mean to be argumentative and I'm sorry it came across that way; I was given some facts that didn't add up and I did a poor job explaining why the facts didn't add up. $\endgroup$ – GeneralBecos Dec 4 '15 at 22:47

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.