2
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand the way generalized canonical ensembles like the pressure ensemble are derived from the standard canonical ensemble.

In the derivation for the standard form, one defines a system $S$ and a reservoir $R$. With a total microcanonical Hamiltonian: $$H(X)=H_S(X)+H_R(X)$$ My question is what do we do to put in the volume exchange? What is the basic idea of going from pure energy exchange with a reservoir to different additional things like volume.

My guess is to just add it as an energy term that is not part of the Hamiltonian?

So then: $$H(X)=H_S(X)-V p+H_R(X)$$ or in general with $y$ being an intensive and $x$ being an intensive variable: $$H(X)=H_S(X)+x y +H_R(X)$$

I would be glad about a correction of my guess or a verification, of course.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ really no one? I think I may have found the answer. If I answer myself will this thread be deleted at some point? $\endgroup$ – pindakaas Dec 2 '15 at 8:33
1
$\begingroup$

The Hamiltonians $H_S$ and $H_R$ both implicitly depend on their respective volumes (or confining potential strength). To allow volume exchange between the two systems, you simply impose the constraint $V_R = V_{tot}-V_S$. The joint Hamiltonian is always given by $H_S+H_R$.

You can check that in mechanical equilibrium, $\partial_{V_S} H_S+\partial_{V_S}H_R=p_S-p_R=0$ implies that $p_S=p_R$.

If the reservoir is so large that $p_R$ changes negligibly as $V_S$ changes, then it is reasonable to work in terms of the intensive quantities $p_R$, $T_R$, $\mu_R$, etc, and we have

$$H_R=p_R\Delta V_S+\dots \; ,$$ where $\dots$ stands for terms that have only a very weak volume dependence. Hence, $$H=H_S+p_R\Delta V_S+\dots \; , $$ where $\dots$ represents terms that do not influence the Hamiltonian of the system. In mechanical equilibrium, we have $$p_S=\partial_{V_S}H_S\Big|_{\text{entropy}}(V_S,\dots)=p_R \; ,$$ so that $$H=H_S(V_S(p_S),\dots)+p_S\Delta V_S \;.$$ This gives rise to the enthalpy expression, similar to the one you wrote down (up to a sign). Note, however, that free energies always involve a coupling between an extensive quantity and an intensive quantity (coordinate and derivative of energy), so that the full expression is extensive.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.