6
$\begingroup$

I seem to have encountered a contradiction when thinking about the directions of $\textbf{H}$ and $\textbf{B}$ inside and outside a bar magnet.

Suppose that a bar magnet has a roughly constant magnetisation M pointing along the positive z direction. Suppose also that the magnet is made from an isotropic material, i.e. $\textbf{M}=\chi_m \textbf{H}$ (1). Therefore $\textbf{H}$ should be pointing in the same direction as $\textbf{M}$, provided that $\chi_m$ is positive, which should be the case for most magnetic materials? From the definition $\textbf{H}=\frac{1}{\mu_0}\textbf{B}-\textbf{M}$ and substituting using (1), we get $\textbf{B}=\mu_0(1+\chi_m)\textbf{H}=\frac{\mu_0(1+\chi_m)}{\chi_m}\textbf{M}=\frac{\mu_0\mu_r}{\mu_r-1}\textbf{M}$. Unless $\mu_r$ is less than 1, $\textbf{B}$ should also be parallel to $\textbf{M}$. Therefore so far we get that both $\textbf{H}$ and $\textbf{B}$ should point in the same direction as direction as $\textbf{M}$ inside the magnet, that is along the positive z direction.

We know that $\nabla\cdot\textbf{B}=0$ and thus applying boundary conditions on the top and bottom surfaces of the magnet (normal to the z axis) using an infinitesimally thin gaussian pillbox, we get that $\textbf{B}^\perp_\textrm{outside}=\textbf{B}^\perp_\textrm{inside}$. Therefore $\textbf{B}$ immediately outside the top surface should also point in the positive z direction. Assuming that there are no free currents near the magnet, $\nabla\times\textbf{H}=\textbf{J}_\textrm{free}=\textbf{0}$. Applying boundary conditions to the side surfaces of the magnet (parallel to the z axis), $\textbf{H}^\parallel_\textrm{outside}=\textbf{H}^\parallel_\textrm{inside}$. Therefore $\textbf{H}$ immediately outside the side surfaces must also point along the positive z direction. However, the field lines must also curl around and meet the top surface of the magnet, where $\textbf{H}$ will therefore need to point in the negative z direction. Since $\textbf{M}=\textbf{0}$ outside, $\textbf{H}=\frac{1}{\mu_0}\textbf{B}-\textbf{M}=\frac{1}{\mu_0}\textbf{B}$ and $\textbf{H}$ needs to be parallel to $\textbf{B}$ but we just argued that they point in opposite directions due to the boundary conditions. How do we resolve this contradiction?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The H-field of a permanent magnet is in the opposite direction to its magnetisation. None of the fields are exactly aligned with the z-axis. $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    Nov 11, 2015 at 7:46
  • $\begingroup$ How is it possible that in the magnet B and H are proportional to M with a positive constant but point in opposite directions? $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2015 at 10:13

2 Answers 2

9
$\begingroup$

You are completely confused about magnetisation and what is meant by a permanent magnet. Permanent bar magnets have an H-field in their interiors that is opposite to their B-fields and is (approximately) independent of the B-field. The H-field in a permanent magnet is not given by the LIH (Linear Isotropic Homogeneous) approximation ${\bf M} = \chi_m {\bf H}$.

Instead the H-field can be calculated (in SI) as $$ \mu_0 {\bf H} = {\bf B} - \mu_0 {\bf M}$$

If ${\bf M}$ is considered large and roughly uniform and points along the axis of the bar magnet and the B-field perpendicular to the end of the magnetic is continuous, then because ${\bf M}=0$ outside the magnet, then we can also see that there must be a discontinuity in ${\bf H}$ (a magnetic pole).

If we let $H_{\rm in}$ and $H_{\rm out}$ be the fields perpendicular to the interface just inside and outside the magnet, let $B$ be the magnitude of the perpendicular field just inside and outside the surface and $M$ be the magnitude of the magnetisation just inside the surface, then $$ \mu_0 H_{\rm in} = B - \mu_0 M$$ $$ \mu_0 H_{\rm out} = B$$ so $$ H_{\rm in} = H_{\rm out} - M$$

If $M > H_{\rm out}$, which is usually the case for a bar magnet, then the H-field inside the bar magnet is in the opposite direction to the magnetisation.

See the diagram below (by Edgar Bonet: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fields_bar_magnet.png )

B-field and H-field of a bar magnet

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ H acts like electric field as if magnetic monopole exists; so its direction inside the bar magnet is same as that of electric dipole. $\endgroup$
    – user36790
    Mar 24, 2016 at 10:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer! I was mistaken in thinking that the magnetisation in a permanent (ferro)magnet is proportional to the H field. It makes much more sense now: since the magnetisation is discontinuous at the poles of the magnet, the poles act as sources for H because $\nabla\cdot\textbf{H}=-\nabla\cdot\textbf{M}$. $\endgroup$ Apr 12, 2016 at 17:02
0
$\begingroup$

$B$ actually behaves as you explain, however there's a problem with $H$.

You say:

"However, the field lines must also curl around and meet the top surface of the magnet, where $H$ will therefore need to point in the negative z direction."

Why the field lines need to meet the top surface of the magnet?

Outside the magnet $B$ and $H$ are proportional so we can use the picture. If you take a line in the upper half of the magnet, the field lines go away from the magnet, then curl and point in the minus z direction, then go near to the magnet and curl.

If you take a line in the lower half of the magnet (the figure doesn't apply), the field goes into the magnet and because we have $div \vec{H} \ne 0$ there is no continuity of the field lines.

Therefore $H$ doesn't point in the minus z direction at the top surface.

Lines of magnetic field in a magnet

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, I am sorry but I don't quite understand what you're getting at. Could you elaborate more? Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2015 at 22:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.