0
$\begingroup$

I have a problem with the Maxwell equations in (2+1) dimensions using differential form. Following J. Baez "Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity" page 93 (or any other book), the equations are

\begin{align}dF &=0\\ *d*F &=J \end{align}

with $J=-\rho dt+j$ which is a 1-form, and $F$ is the electromagnetic tensor field (2-form). These equations give the correct Maxwell equations in (3+1) dimension but in (2+1) there is a different equation with a minus sign

\begin{align}\text{div} \;E=-\rho. \end{align}

To detail the things \begin{align} F &=B dx\wedge dy-E_x dt\wedge dx-E_y dt \wedge dy\\ *F &=B dt+E_x dy-E_y dx\\ d*F &= -(\partial_t E_y-\partial_x B) dt\wedge dx+(\partial_t E_x-\partial_y B) dt\wedge dy+(\partial_x E_x+\partial_y E_y) dx\wedge dy\\ *d*F &= (\partial_x E_x+\partial_y E_y) dt+(\partial_t E_x-\partial_y B) dx+(\partial_t E_y-\partial_x B) dy \end{align}

which implies

\begin{align}\text{div} \;E=-\rho. \end{align}

WHY, there is a negative sign?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

There's something wrong with your sign permutations in the Hodge star operator calculation. If

$F = B + E \wedge dt$,

then, in 2D,

$F = B dx \wedge dy + E_x dx \wedge dt + E_y dy \wedge dt$,

as you wrote yourself. Now, let us take our initial Hodge star as $\star dx \wedge dy = dt$. This means that $\star dt \wedge dx = dy$ and $\star dy \wedge dt = dx$, by cyclic permutation (right hand rule, and here's your mistake, I think). This means that

$\star F = B dt - E_x dy + E_y dx$,

which disagrees in sign to what you got. Indeed, it is easy to see that

$(\star d \star F)(\partial_t) = - (\partial_x E_x + \partial_y E_y) $ ,

which fixes the sign implying $\nabla \cdot E = \rho$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The formula for the hodge operator I have is $*dx\wedge dt=\epsilon^{10}_{~~~~~2}dy=-\epsilon_{102}dy=dy$. This is why, I'm getting $+E_x dy$ $\endgroup$ – anubis Nov 4 '15 at 21:03
  • $\begingroup$ Well, if you want $\star dx \wedge dt = dy$, then you must necessarily have $\star dy \wedge dx = dt$ (sign change) and $\star dt \wedge dy = dx$, which fixes your sign yet again. You're using wrong Hodge duals in analyzing $\star d \star F$. $\endgroup$ – QuantumBrick Nov 4 '15 at 21:13
  • $\begingroup$ Thx. If you have the Nakahara (Geometry, Topology and physics), could you please tell me if his formula 7.172 is incorrect, because this is the one I'm using $\endgroup$ – anubis Nov 4 '15 at 22:20
  • $\begingroup$ No, Nakahara is not incorrect. It's just complicating something very simple. The Wikipedia article for the Hodge dual is much better than Nakahara's, in my opinion. I think you are probably doing something wrong with your signs when using Nakahara's formula, that's all $\endgroup$ – QuantumBrick Nov 5 '15 at 2:46
  • $\begingroup$ @anubis If I didn't answer your question please tell me and I will elaborate even more. If I did, and I think this is the case, please set my post as an answer so that this matter can be closed. $\endgroup$ – QuantumBrick Nov 5 '15 at 12:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.